DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Patient Privacy Rights grades PHRs

Posted on December 2, 2009 by Dissent

Patient Privacy Rights has issued a privacy-oriented report card on some of the available PHRs (personal health records).  For those who prefer to cut to the bottom line, the grades issued were as follows:

CapMed- icePHR: C
Google Health D/F [Platform Grade: D,  Partners Grade: F]
Microsoft HealthVault B/F [Platform Grade: B,  Partners Grade: F]
NoMoreClipboard: A
WebMD:  C
PHRs Offered by Employers and Insurers: F

Detailed report cards for each PHR are available on their site.  Systems were assessed on five categories of concerns:

  • Privacy Policy/Notice
  • Patient Control/Choice
  • Access/Participation
  • Integrity/Security
  • Customer Service/Enforcement

For comparison purposes, I generated a quick chart showing how each PHR was rated on each criterion. In the chart below:

C: CapMed- icePHR
G: Google Health
GP: Google Partners
M: Microsoft HealthVault
MP: Microsoft Healthvault Partners
N: No More Clipboard
W: WebMD

Not reflected in the chart below are PHRs offered by employers or health insurers. Based solely on forms available on some of their web sites, Patient Privacy Rights gave them all a grade of F as a caution to people who might consider using them.

ppr

Explanation of what each criterion means can be found in the detailed report cards, and a detailed FAQ on PHRs can be found on PPR’s site.

Inspection of the summary chart suggests that if you’re concerned about people accessing your information, be very cautious about using PHRs where “partners” or add-on programs or providers of tools may not have clear policies that tell you how they will or might use your data or that do not allow you to track who has accessed your information. While a platform may allow you to totally remove your data and information, their partners or add-on programs may not all you to do.

PPR does not recommend any particular PHR. In discussing their report card, Ashley Katz, Executive Director of PPR said:

“The good news is there are companies that offer meaningful ways to control your private information. Some PHRs only share your information with your explicit permission. Some allow you to segment “or lock-up” extra sensitive information, so it can only be seen by those that you permit. Some offer easily accessible reports of who saw and used your information, when and why.

The bad news is other companies do not allow patients to control their PHRs. That is a scary thing when you consider that PHRs can store sensitive health information as well as lifestyle habits such as what you eat, how much you drink, and how often you exercise. This information can easily get into the wrong hands, especially if your PHR is offered by an employer or insurer. All PHRs claim to be ‘patient-centric’ and claim that ‘privacy is important,’ but it’s simply not true.”

Finding the right PHR for you requires some time and research on your part, but before you share your info, make sure you understand who can access and whether you can adequately control what is important to you.

No related posts.

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← MO: Personal Documents Discovered in Dumpster (updated)
Healthcare Data Breaches Slow To Surface →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • No need to hack when it’s leaking: Brandt Kettwick Defense edition
  • SK Telecom to be fined for late data breach report, ordered to waive cancellation fees, criminal investigation into them launched
  • Louis Vuitton Korea suffers cyberattack as customer data leaked
  • Hunters International to provide free decryptors for all victims as they shut down (2)
  • SEC and SolarWinds Seek Settlement in Securities Fraud Case
  • Cyberattacks Disrupt Iran’s Bread Distribution, Payments Remain Frozen
  • Hacker with ‘political agenda’ stole data from Columbia, university says
  • Keymous+ Hacker Group Claims Responsibility for Over 700 Global DDoS Attacks
  • Data breach reveals Catwatchful ‘stalkerware’ is spying on thousands of phones
  • DOJ investigates ex-ransomware negotiator over extortion kickbacks

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Record-Breaking $1.55M CCPA Settlement Against Health Information Website Publisher
  • Ninth Circuit Reviews Website Tracking Class Actions and the Reach of California’s Privacy Law
  • US healthcare offshoring: Navigating patient data privacy laws and regulations
  • Data breach reveals Catwatchful ‘stalkerware’ is spying on thousands of phones
  • Google Trackers: What You Can Actually Escape And What You Can’t
  • Oregon Amends Its Comprehensive Privacy Statute
  • Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Liberal Majority Strikes Down 176-Year-Old Abortion Ban

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report