DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Triple-S Salud fined $6.8M for HIPAA breach (updated)

Posted on February 17, 2014 by Dissent

Caribbean Business reports that Triple-S Salud has been fined nearly $6.8 million for violations of the federal Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA). Triple-S Salud is a licensee of Blue Cross Blue Shield of  Puerto Rico and handles managed care for Medicare enrollees.

The penalty handed down by the Puerto Rico government’s Medical Insurance Administration (ASES by its Spanish acronym) against the unit of San Juan-based Triple-S Management Corp. stem from a probe into a privacy breach last year.

ASES Director Ricardo Rivera said Triple-S Salud was fined $6.7 million improperly handled private health records of more than 13,330 patients in written correspondence to them. Another $100,000 fined was tacked on after the company provided vague or incomplete information during the probe, he said.

The sanctions also bar Triple-S Salud from signing up more beneficiaries for its Platino line until it presents a corrective plan to avoid such HIPAA violations.

Read more on Caribbean Business.

A notice on ASES’s web site (in Spanish) explains that on September 20, 2013, Triple-S Salud sent a mailing that exposed Medicare Health Insurance Claim Numbers in the mailing addresses.  They became aware of their error on September 23, 2013.

This breach had been added to HHS’s public breach tool last month and I had commented on it here. It’s still not clear to me what the other 70,000+ entry for Triple-S Salud on that same date in HHS’s breach tool refers to.

As I’ve noted before, Triple-S Salud has had some big breaches, and this was not their first fine – although it is certainly their largest fine.  It’s important to note that this fine does not appear to have been issued by HHS/OCR but by the government of Puerto Rico.  This appears to be the largest monetary penalty ever issued for a HIPAA breach, unless I’m forgetting something?

Post corrected to reflect it was health insurance claim numbers and not account numbers.

Update: Anna Prior of the WSJ reports on the penalty, here.


Related:

  • Another plastic surgery practice fell prey to a cyberattack that acquired patient photos and info
  • Two U.K. teenagers appear in court over Transport of London cyber attack
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • Massachusetts hospitals Heywood, Athol say outage was a cybersecurity incident
  • Heritage Provider Network $49.99M Class Action Settlement
Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Muslim Directory hacked, 38,903 User Credentials Leaked
Employee’s Unauthorized Texting of Confidential Health Information May Impose Employer Liability →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.