DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Inspira Vineland notifying patients about December theft of computers with PHI

Posted on February 21, 2014 by Dissent

On December 27, I blogged:

Four days after a computer was stolen from Inspira Medical Center Vineland, the hospital still can’t say whether there was any patient data on it?

The hospital issued a statement the next day saying that no patient data was on the stolen computers, but as I noted on January 17,  when they announced an arrest had been made in the case on December 30:

When contacted Friday, another spokesman reiterated Inspira does not believe the stolen equipment contained patient information. “We are still reviewing to confirm that is correct,” spokesman Paul Simon said.

So more than three weeks after the theft, they still weren’t sure whether patient data was on the stolen computer(s)? That suggests a serious failure in safeguards and inventorying, as I suggested back in December 2013.

Now today, Don E. Woods reports:

Inspira Health Network plans on notifying 1,411 patients about a potential data breach after a former employee allegedly stole two computers from Vineland’s radiology department last December.

The health network is sending out letters this week to patients who had imaging studies at Inspira Medical Center Vineland from January 2009 to Dec. 23, 2013.

Inspira has reportedly tried to reassure that there is low risk of acquisition of PHI or misuse, even though:

By conducting an analysis of a similar computer to the ones stolen, Inspira determined that the hard drive may have contained patient information stored as temporary Internet files, including X-rays, scans, patient names, birth dates, patient numbers, dates of service, and even some cases of Social Security numbers.

It was also determined, according to Inspira, that it would be highly unlikely for anyone to retrieve this data from the discarded hard drive and that person would face “significant difficulties” retrieving the data.

Inspira notified the patients as a precautionary measure and continues to cooperate with the ongoing investigation.

Read more on NJ.com

There does not seem to be any notice linked from either Inspira’s or Vineland’s homepage.

This is probably a breach that HHS may wish to pursue as it points to the risks of not knowing whether PHI is on your devices or not. It also reminds us about the risks of retaining old patient data on devices. Why were data from 2009 still on the computers instead of being transferred to backup or storage?

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Church of Scotland Hacked, 1,570 User & 9 Admin Accounts Leaked
Department of Veterans Affairs was warned privacy breach was practically unavoidable →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Beyond the Pond Phish: Unraveling Lazarus Group’s Evolving Tactics
  • Akira doesn’t keep its promises to victims — SuspectFile
  • Fraudsters, murderers, students: who the GRU assembled a team of hacker provocateurs from and why it failed
  • Order of Psychologists of Lombardy fined 30,000 € for inadequate data security protection and detection following ransomware attack
  • Lower Merion School District says a data breach was caused by a computer glitch (1)
  • After $1 Million Ransom Demand, Virgin Islands Lottery Restores Operations Without Paying Hackers
  • Junior Defence Contractor Arrested For Leaking Indian Naval Secrets To Suspected Pakistani Spies
  • Mysterious leaker GangExposed outs Conti kingpins in massive ransomware data dump
  • Resource: HoganLovells Asia-Pacific Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity Guide 2025
  • Class action settlement following ransomware attack will cost Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center about $52 million

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Stewart Baker vs. Orin Kerr on “The Digital Fourth Amendment”
  • Fears Grow Over ICE’s Reach Into Schools
  • Resource: HoganLovells Asia-Pacific Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity Guide 2025
  • She Got an Abortion. So A Texas Cop Used 83,000 Cameras to Track Her Down.
  • Why AI May Be Listening In on Your Next Doctor’s Appointment
  • Watch out for activist judges trying to deprive us of our rights to safe reproductive healthcare
  • Nebraska Bans Minor Social Media Accounts Without Parental Consent

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.