DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Two Defendants Sentenced In Stolen Identity Tax Refund Scheme Relating To A Health Care Provider

Posted on February 23, 2014 by Dissent

Wifredo A. Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and José A. Gonzalez, Special Agent in Charge, Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI), announced that Angelo Ponds, 32, of Miami Gardens, and Sean Guillaume, 31, of Miramar, were sentenced February 21 for their participation in a stolen identity tax refund scheme relating to a health care provider. Ponds was sentenced to 48 months in prison, to be followed by three years of supervised release. Guillaume was sentenced to 94 months in prison, to be followed by three years of supervised release.

Both defendants previously pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to defraud the government, in violation of Title 18, United Stated Code, Section 286, and one count of aggravated identity theft in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028A.

According to court documents, Guillaume worked for a company that performed medical laboratory tests where he had access to medical records with names, dates of birth, and Social Security numbers (personal identity information or “PII”) of individuals in the course of his employment with that company.

During the conspiracy, Guillaume stole PII from the company and sold five thousand individuals’ PII to Ponds. Guillaume knew that Ponds would use the PII for the filing of fraudulent and unauthorized tax returns. Ponds caused other individuals to file false and fraudulent tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) seeking refunds using the PII provided by Guillaume.

Mr. Ferrer commended the investigative efforts of IRS-CI. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael N. Berger.

SOURCE: U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Florida

The healthcare provider was not named in any of the press releases or court filings and so far, I’ve been unable to nail it down conclusively and/or whether it is related to another similar case involving a testing laboratory in Florida named in another case.  That other case involved Apex Laboratory, and that breach was never reported to HHS, according to a spokesperson for HHS.  Was the breach involving Ponds and Guillaume ever reported to HHS? It doesn’t appear to have been based on Florida entries described on HHS’s public breach tool.

So is this a separate incident involving a second lab or the same lab?  Apex Laboratory reportedly learned of their breach in July 2012 from law enforcement. According to the Grand Jury indictment in the Ponds and Guillaume prosecution, that data theft occurred from in or around January 2012  and continued through on or about March 28, 2013, suggesting that these might be two different cases – or at least two different facilities. 

And were all the patients whose data were misused by Ponds and Guillaume notified and offered harm mitigation? 

Hopefully, HHS will open an investigation into these two criminal cases to determine whether the covered entity or entities involved met all their data security and breach obligations.

Category: Health DataID TheftU.S.

Post navigation

← 'Hacking' may reveal personal health risks
UK: Hospital records of all NHS patients sold to insurers →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Nova Scotia Power hit by cyberattack, critical infrastructure targeted, no outages reported
  • Georgia hospital defeats data-tracking lawsuit
  • 60K BTC Wallets Tied to LockBit Ransomware Gang Leaked
  • UK: Legal Aid Agency hit by cyber security incident
  • Public notice for individuals affected by an information security breach in the Social Services, Health Care and Rescue Services Division of Helsinki
  • PowerSchool paid a hacker’s extortion demand, but now school district clients are being extorted anyway (3)
  • Defending Against UNC3944: Cybercrime Hardening Guidance from the Frontlines
  • Call for Public Input: Essential Cybersecurity Protections for K-12 Schools (2025-26 SY)
  • Cyberattack puts healthcare on hold for hundreds in St. Louis metro
  • Europol: DDoS-for-hire empire brought down: Poland arrests 4 administrators, US seizes 9 domains

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Apple Siri Eavesdropping Payout Deadline Confirmed—How To Make A Claim
  • Privacy matters to Canadians – Privacy Commissioner of Canada marks Privacy Awareness Week with release of latest survey results
  • Missouri Clinic Must Give State AG Minor Trans Care Information
  • Georgia hospital defeats data-tracking lawsuit
  • No Postal Service Data Sharing to Deport Immigrants
  • DOGE aims to pool federal data, putting personal information at risk
  • Privacy concerns swirl around HHS plan to build Medicare, Medicaid database on autism

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.