DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

IEEE members notified of second breach in as many months

Posted on April 20, 2011 by Dissent

The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) describes itself as the world’s largest technical professional organization with over 365,000 members worldwide, but some of its members may be feeling a bit beleaguered after receiving what may be their second breach notice in as many months.

In February, the association notified 828 members that an intruder may have accessed or acquired their names and credit card numbers, complete with expiration dates and security codes.

Now, an unspecified number of members who signed up for Term Life insurance underwritten by New York Life Insurance are being notified that due to a mailing error, offers they received to upgrade their insurance plan were sent to the correct addresses but exposed other members’ names and member numbers.

A recipient of an erroneous offer and breach notification  sent the documents to DataBreaches.net. I’ve uploaded them here, complete with the recipient’s notations that indicate that not only was the name and member number not his, but the coverage amount was not his and probably belonged to the individual whose name appeared on his letter.

The breach is somewhat similar in description to a breach affecting AARP members that was reported in November 2010. Their insurance was also underwritten by New York Life Insurance, but in that incident, more personal information was exposed, such as dates of birth. It was not reported in the media who was responsible for that mailing error – AARP or some other entity.

In this case, New York Life Insurance says that it had no role in the privacy breach.  According to a spokesperson for the insurance company, “The mailing address information did not go from New York Life to Marsh… Marsh is handling this incident.”  It is not known how many IEEE members have received notifications.

Marsh U.S. Consumer, who sent the breach notification letters to IEEE members, is a service of Seabury & Smith. This appears to be at least their second breach in recent months. Other Seabury & Smith services have also reported breaches within the past year, including a lost backup tape and improperly exposing a Sperian folder containing encrypted employee information to the company’s medical insurance carrier.

Category: Breach IncidentsBusiness SectorExposurePaperU.S.

Post navigation

← HK: Leak fear as hospital loses patient details
Texas fires two tech chiefs over breach →

1 thought on “IEEE members notified of second breach in as many months”

  1. Dom DeMarco says:
    April 21, 2011 at 12:12 pm

    This was a vendor mailing system error and IEEE data security has not been breached.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Romanian Citizen Pleads Guilty to ‘Swatting’ Numerous Members of Congress, Churches, and Former U.S. President
  • North Dakota Enacts Financial Data Security and Data Breach Notification Requirements
  • Pro-Ukraine hacker group Black Owl poses ‘major threat’ to Russia, Kaspersky says
  • Vanta bug exposed customers’ data to other customers
  • Lyrix Ransomware Targets Windows Users with Advanced Evasion Techniques
  • Central Maine Healthcare tackles suspected cybersecurity issue; hospitals remain open
  • Cartier Data Breach: Luxury Retailer Warns Customers that Personal Data Was Exposed
  • Beyond the Pond Phish: Unraveling Lazarus Group’s Evolving Tactics
  • Akira doesn’t keep its promises to victims — SuspectFile
  • Fraudsters, murderers, students: who the GRU assembled a team of hacker provocateurs from and why it failed

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Stewart Baker vs. Orin Kerr on “The Digital Fourth Amendment”
  • Fears Grow Over ICE’s Reach Into Schools
  • Resource: HoganLovells Asia-Pacific Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity Guide 2025
  • She Got an Abortion. So A Texas Cop Used 83,000 Cameras to Track Her Down.
  • Why AI May Be Listening In on Your Next Doctor’s Appointment
  • Watch out for activist judges trying to deprive us of our rights to safe reproductive healthcare
  • Nebraska Bans Minor Social Media Accounts Without Parental Consent

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report