DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

D&J Optical sues former employees for misappropriation of patient/proprietary information

Posted on September 11, 2014 by Dissent

D&J Optical in Alabama reported a breach to HHS that appears to have involved a hacking/IT incident on November 15, 2013. It is not clear when they first reported the breach to HHS, but it was only added to HHS’s breach tool on August 25. The incident reportedly affected 1,100 patients.

In attempting to investigate the breach, I could find no coverage in the media nor any substitute notice still available online.

What I did find, however, was a lawsuit filed by D&J Optical in Alabama Middle District Court on July 8, 2014. The defendants in that suit are Dr. Tammy Wallace, Debbie Hughes, and Enterprise Optical, LLC. Wallace was an independent contractor for D&J and Hughes was an employee who handled insurance and patient billing for the practice.

According to D&J’s complaint, Hughes had access to the server in the course of her duties, with an individually assigned username and password for login. Wallace did not have any login credentials to access the server.

Of note, the complaint, which alleges violation of CFAA, violation of DMCA, and numerous state claims, details some of what D&J uncovered after both Wallace and Hughes resigned their positions and D&J suddenly started receiving faxed requests for dozens of their patients’ records:

Kyle Jones also discovered that Cisco Mobility Client software had been installed without authorization on a D & J Optical workstation and that a wireless transmitter had been plugged into a USB port of a workstation. These items allowed remote access to the server through a wireless access point or virtual private network (“VPN”). At least seven user names were established without authorization, none of whom were employees of D & J Optical. This configuration could allow access to the server remotely. None of this was created or authorized by D & J Optical.

Kyle Jones also discovered a wire from the company’s internet access point extending into the attic of the building. This wire connected a booster located in the attic which could allow access to a workstation from the internet.

Consultant Tom Rivers was able to determine that the D & J Optical server was remotely accessed from an IP address assigned to the Ozark D & J Optical network by a computer named “WALLACEFAMILY.” Access from this computer began at least by October 31, 2013 and continued at least until December 2, 2013, which Was after Wallace terminated her contract with D & J optical.

D & J Optical workstations also have been accessed remotely from computer addresses that can be traced to Enterprise Optical on dates both before and after Wallace and Hughes terminated employment with D & J Optical.

So it appears that this breach involves allegations of insider wrongdoing.

I’ve uploaded the complaint in D&J Optical v. Wallace et al. here (pdf, 33 pp), as well as Wallace’s response and counter-claim (pdf, 19 pp.). For the rest of the filings, see PACER.

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Midwest Women's Healthcare Specialists breach may have affected over 1,300 patients
HHS corrects entry for LANAP & Implant Center breach →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Alleged Geisinger hacker will defend himself pro se.
  • Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare reveals it was also impacted by Cerner/Legacy Oracle cyberattack
  • Hospital cyberattack investigation complete, no formal review needed
  • Largest Ever Seizure of Funds Related to Crypto Confidence Scams
  • IMPACT: 170 patients harmed as a result of Qilin’s ransomware attack on NHS vendor Synnovis
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • UBS reports data leak after cyber attack on provider, client data unaffected
  • Scania confirms insurance claim data breach in extortion attempt
  • Cybersecurity takes a big hit in new Trump executive order
  • Episource notifying 5.4 million patients of cyberattack in January

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data
  • DOJ Seeks More Time on Tower Dumps
  • Your household smart products must respect your privacy – including your air fryer
  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report