DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

MGH scandal continues

Posted on January 12, 2010 by Dissent

Hannah Clay Wareham reports:

The debacle beginning in March 2009 with the loss of confidential patient records on a Red Line train continues in the new year with allegations of harassment against Massachusetts General Hospital staff.

[…]

Soon after Jacob received the administrative assistant’s e-mail, Jacob says an anonymous caller alerted him to the appearance of his name on “The Rip-off Report,” an anonymous user-generated Web site that contains information about companies and individuals that are accused of taking advantage of various systems. Jacob was shocked after reading what was written about him. “It was everything about me: my Medicare ID number, my Masshealth ID number, my medical record number, all my utility account records and everything,” he said. The entry also included Jacob’s social security number, address, and phone number, and falsely accused Jacob of being a level-three sex offender.

The anonymous author of the report claims to be writing “on behalf of a very good friend of mine who works at MGH, a prominent Boston hospital. My friend works with HIV+ and AIDS patients and is being bullied, harassed, stalked and she is trying very hard to have this man; [Jacob] removed from the hospital [sic].”

Read the complete news story on EdgeBoston.

Dissent comments:

As of today’s date, there are two reports about Jacob posted to RipoffReport.com, presumably by the same individual who self-describes as a paralegal who looked up his information. The individual writes, in part:

She got to the point that she felt that his potential lawsuit against her and her boss is making her ill, she is afraid of this man and although he can not be discharged as a patient she can not face him anymore. Now he is starting to visit outside her home, call her at home and she does not know what to do anymore. She does however have me as an external person who works at a law firm that she shared some private information about him that we need to make public.

“We” as in “we, the law firm I work for” or “we” as in “an employee who is covered by HIPAA and I?” I seriously doubt any reputable law firm would publish such information, raising the question for me as to whether the MGH employee formally retained/consulted with the law firm, and if so, do they know what their paralegal is posting? And if the paralegal is doing this on her own time, is she abusing access to any databases to get information for a personal matter?

I hope that the poster, the employee, and maybe even the law firm if they knew about this, are all brought to account for what appears to be an egregious privacy breach.


Related:

  • Two more entities have folded after ransomware attacks
  • Data breach feared after cyberattack on AMEOS hospitals in Germany
  • Premier Health Partners issues a press release about a breach two years ago. Why was this needed now?
  • Theft from Glasgow’s Queen Elizabeth University Hospital sparks probe
  • North Country Healthcare responds to Stormous's claims of a breach
  • Texas Enacts Electronic Health Record Data Localization Law
Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← ISP operators among 19 arrested in cyber-fraud case
New Chinese Tort Liability Law Contains Provisions Affecting Personal Data →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Scattered Spider Hijacks VMware ESXi to Deploy Ransomware on Critical U.S. Infrastructure
  • Hacker group “Silent Crow” claims responsibility for cyberattack on Russia’s Aeroflot
  • AIIMS ORBO Portal Vulnerability Exposing Sensitive Organ Donor Data Discovered by Researcher
  • Two Data Breaches in Three Years: McKenzie Health
  • Scattered Spider is running a VMware ESXi hacking spree
  • BreachForums — the one that went offline in April — reappears with a new founder/owner
  • Fans React After NASCAR Confirms Ransomware Breach
  • Allianz Life says ‘majority’ of customers’ personal data stolen in cyberattack (1)
  • Infinite Services notifying employees and patients of limited ransomware attack
  • The safe place for women to talk wasn’t so safe: hackers leak 13,000 user photos and IDs from the Tea app

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Congress tries to outlaw AI that jacks up prices based on what it knows about you
  • Microsoft’s controversial Recall feature is now blocked by Brave and AdGuard
  • Trump Administration Issues AI Action Plan and Series of AI Executive Orders
  • Indonesia asked to reassess data privacy terms in new U.S. trade deal
  • Meta Denies Tracking Menstrual Data in Flo Health Privacy Trial
  • Wikipedia seeks to shield contributors from UK law targeting online anonymity
  • British government reportedlu set to back down on secret iCloud backdoor after US pressure

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.