DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

FTC: Health Breach Notification Rule

Posted on January 18, 2010 by Dissent

From the FTC:

Does your business or organization have a website that allows people to maintain their medical information online? Do you provide applications for personal health records – say, a device that allows people to upload readings from a blood pressure cuff or pedometer into their personal health record?

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 includes provisions to strengthen privacy and security protections for this new sector of web-based businesses. The law directed the Federal Trade Commission to issue a rule requiring companies to contact customers in the event of a security breach. After receiving comments from the public, the FTC issued the Health Breach Notification Rule.

Under the FTC’s Rule, companies that have had a security breach must:

  1. Notify everyone whose information was breached;
  2. In many cases, notify the media; and
  3. Notify the FTC.

The FTC has designed a standard form for companies to use to notify the FTC of a breach. The FTC will begin enforcement on February 22, 2010.

The FTC’s Health Breach Notification Rule applies only to health information that is not secured through technologies specified by the Department of Health and Human Services. Also, the FTC’s Rule does not apply to businesses or organizations covered by the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA). In case of a security breach, entities covered by HIPAA must comply with HHS’ breach notification rule.

Interestingly, the list of choices for Type of Breach lists:

  • Lost or stolen laptop, computer, flash drive, disk, etc.
  • Stolen password or credentials
  • Unauthorized access by an employee or contractor
  • Hacker
  • Other (describe)

I might have broken it down a bit more to list malware, exposure due to file-sharing application, exposure due to insider error (such as email attachment).  I would also include a sub-level for lost/stolen that asks whether the device was lost or stolen from the premises, off-premises, or unknown.  And I’d give them an option to check if the company received an extortion attempt.   But that’s just me — I love to get more data that can be analyzed and having specific bullets as opposed to “describe” for “other” could facilitate data analysis.

H/T, HIPAA Blog.

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← AU: Expert claims health records can't be kept secret
UK: ContactPoint database suffers ‘serious’ security breaches during trial phase →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • UBS reports data leak after cyber attack on provider, client data unaffected
  • Scania confirms insurance claim data breach in extortion attempt
  • Cybersecurity takes a big hit in new Trump executive order
  • Episource notifying 5.4 million patients of cyberattack in January
  • Investigation of 2024 Helsinki data breach – Report
  • Major trial underway for data leak that left 72,000 victims in France
  • Anubis: A Closer Look at an Emerging Ransomware with Built-in Wiper
  • HealthEC Agrees to $5.48 Million Settlement to End Data Breach Lawsuit
  • US offering $10 million for info on Iranian hackers behind IOControl malware

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data
  • DOJ Seeks More Time on Tower Dumps
  • Your household smart products must respect your privacy – including your air fryer
  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.