DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Doctor-Patient 'Web Visits' Spur Privacy Concerns

Posted on April 3, 2008October 24, 2024 by Dissent

On NPR today:

As more doctors go online to communicate with patients, two of the country’s biggest health insurers have started reimbursing patients for the Internet visits. But critics say the online advising could lead to errors, and patient privacy could be compromised.

Listen to the interview on NPR.

iHealthBeat describes the segment:

Earlier this year, Aetna and Cigna began paying for online doctor’s visits through the site RelayHealth and have marketed the service to about one million physicians. The site allows patients to:

  • Ask for referrals;
  • Obtain a prescription refill;
  • Schedule online consultations with physicians; and
  • Request in-office appointments.

The service saves time for patients and providers, and consultations often cost less than in-person office visits, according to insurers.

The segment includes comments from:

  • James Rohack, a cardiologist and American Medical Association board member;
  • Ken Tarkoff, general manager of RelayHealth;
  • A Cigna spokesperson;
  • An Oakland, Calif., internist who uses RelayHealth to communicate with patients; and
  • Patients who use the service (Kennedy, “Morning Edition,” NPR, 4/3).

iHealthBeat‘s earlier coverage on this topic, “Insurers Begin To Reimburse Physicians for Online Visits,” can be found here.

Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← First Britney, Now Farrah: More Privacy Issues at UCLA Hospital
Privacy advocate's health data is stolen →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Episource notifying 5.4 million patients of cyberattack in January
  • Investigation of 2024 Helsinki data breach – Report
  • Major trial underway for data leak that left 72,000 victims in France
  • Anubis: A Closer Look at an Emerging Ransomware with Built-in Wiper
  • HealthEC Agrees to $5.48 Million Settlement to End Data Breach Lawsuit
  • US offering $10 million for info on Iranian hackers behind IOControl malware
  • Sompo Japan Insurance submits improvement plan after info leakage
  • Moreno Valley, Calif., Schools Report Data Breach
  • The Growing Cyber Risks from AI — and How Organizations Can Fight Back
  • UPDATING: Credit Control Corporation denies any current breach

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data
  • DOJ Seeks More Time on Tower Dumps
  • Your household smart products must respect your privacy – including your air fryer
  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.