DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

(update) Travelodge blames ‘vindictive individual’ for email database breach

Posted on August 5, 2011 by Dissent

John Leyden has a follow-up on an e-mail hack  The Register initially revealed in June and that I covered on this blog. Travelodge UK’s explanation doesn’t fully answer my questions, but here’s part of it:

This enquiry has thoroughly examined our own IT infrastructures and databases and those belonging to our suppliers as well. The key findings from this report have revealed that we have been the unfortunate victims of a malicious attack because of the vindictive actions of one individual, who had access to an unencrypted section of our marketing database.

We can confirm no financial data has been stolen, accessed or compromised. This information is held on a standalone, off-site separate server. The data itself is encrypted and complies with current best practice standards and is audited to PCI (Payment Card Industry) requirements.

A small number of customers’ names and email addresses were stolen, and these were used for the spam email.

Read more on The Register.  It sounds to me that this was a compromise at an e-mail service provider.  But if the data were encrypted, was this an inside job?   I wish Travelodge UK would issue a more unambiguous statement – and if it was an ESP, which one?

Category: Breach IncidentsBusiness SectorHackNon-U.S.Subcontractor

Post navigation

← View one year of Medical Identity Theft
n-europe.com hacked by @V0iD_Hacker →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Hospital cyberattack investigation complete, no formal review needed
  • Largest Ever Seizure of Funds Related to Crypto Confidence Scams
  • IMPACT: 170 patients harmed as a result of Qilin’s ransomware attack on NHS vendor Synnovis
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • UBS reports data leak after cyber attack on provider, client data unaffected
  • Scania confirms insurance claim data breach in extortion attempt
  • Cybersecurity takes a big hit in new Trump executive order
  • Episource notifying 5.4 million patients of cyberattack in January
  • Investigation of 2024 Helsinki data breach – Report
  • Major trial underway for data leak that left 72,000 victims in France

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data
  • DOJ Seeks More Time on Tower Dumps
  • Your household smart products must respect your privacy – including your air fryer
  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report