DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Defining Reasonable Security

Posted on August 3, 2012 by Dissent

Tracy Kitten writes:

Last month, an appellate court in Boston reversed a lower court’s ruling that favored a bank in a legal dispute over a 2009 account takeover incident (see PATCO ACH Fraud Ruling Reversed.)

Was that appellate ruling fair? Based on the security practices that most banking institutions used in 2009, probably not. The case exemplifies the challenges courts – and the attorneys arguing both sides – face in resolving cases involving ACH and wire fraud. The key issue? How to define “reasonable” security – and how that definition changes over time.

Read more on BankInfoSecurity.

Category: Commentaries and Analyses

Post navigation

← More transparency needed in Health Authority insider breaches
GM notifying more than 800 workers of personal information breach →

1 thought on “Defining Reasonable Security”

  1. IA Eng says:
    August 8, 2012 at 3:07 pm

    A few things stay standard ; The meaning of Due Diligence and Due Care. Its a Q&A solution that works. If withdrawals are out of normal and accepted, since the bank customers are protected by FDIC, it’s the responsibility to have safegaurds in place to notice these things. People trust a banking institution to safguard their property.

    On the other hand, if statements show illegal charges in any situation it is the responsibility of the client to report them immediately to the bank and fill out and certify that charges listed are fraudulent and should be investigated.

    Think BIG business. The effort some – Many – Most businesses of all kinds “accept” a level of profit and are comfortable in achieving that number month over month. If this way of doing business works – why change? Even if they have to kick some funds over to cover identity theft or other issue, they are still above water.

    When the situation changes, or new ways of doing bsuiness are introduced, the banks especially are VERY reluctant to do so. It introduces costs and potential new risks and methods to master, which may take many, many years.

    In all events, to save ones’ Assets its best to ensure Quality Asurance, Information Assurance and Change management is in place in order to run an effective organization. You want Security? it requires some pain and anguish – But that effort will bring strength to the organization and along with that brings Trust. In My opinion, the “Trust” has been severly tainted lately, both on the organizational and citizen levels. Its all about making a quick buck, without watching that trainwreck of risk inbound.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Investigation of 2024 Helsinki data breach – Report
  • Major trial underway for data leak that left 72,000 victims in France
  • Anubis: A Closer Look at an Emerging Ransomware with Built-in Wiper
  • HealthEC Agrees to $5.48 Million Settlement to End Data Breach Lawsuit
  • US offering $10 million for info on Iranian hackers behind IOControl malware
  • Sompo Japan Insurance submits improvement plan after info leakage
  • Moreno Valley, Calif., Schools Report Data Breach
  • The Growing Cyber Risks from AI — and How Organizations Can Fight Back
  • UPDATING: Credit Control Corporation denies any current breach
  • Copilot AI Bug Could Leak Sensitive Data via Email Prompts

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Your household smart products must respect your privacy – including your air fryer
  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.