DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Lawmakers: Tougher computer hacking laws may be needed

Posted on March 16, 2013 by Dissent

Grant Gross reports:

Congress may need to create stiffer penalties for criminal computer hacking to deter the growing number of attacks on U.S. government agencies and businesses, some lawmakers said Wednesday.

Congress may revisit the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), the oft-amended law first passed in 1984, in an effort to counter widespread cyberattacks on U.S. computers, said Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, a Wisconsin Republican and chairman of the House  Judiciary Committee’s crime subcommittee.

Read more on Computerworld.  CFAA definitely needs revision – but not to increase penalties as much as exempting responsible disclosure and other acts that should not result in criminal prosecution or prison time.

Category: Breach Laws

Post navigation

← Fake fingers fool punch-in clock in Brazil
More problems for Subway: Feds charge two men in plot to sell hacked Subway gift cards worth $40,000 →

2 thoughts on “Lawmakers: Tougher computer hacking laws may be needed”

  1. IA ENG says:
    March 18, 2013 at 1:24 pm

    You think? Like I said before and I will say it again. if your “stealing” from some one, be it in person or from behind the screen of a computer monitor, the punishment should be equal. Just like armed robbery of a bank; aggrevation is aggrevation, whether in person or from an alternate means. Throw the book at em ! Give the computer geek the same sentence as the pperson would get standing there at the teller with a knife or gun, in the case of a bank heist…… if you have a minimum MANDATORY sentence, it should be the same.

    Put it in black and white. Draw out different severity levels with pretty accuarte descriptions. Include a cach-all for anything that doesn’t fit give a minimum mandatory sentence in each area.

    There are plenty of data breach experts. There have been plenty of costs assocaited with the data breaches. The government needs to ASK FOR ASSISTANCE when it comes to writing rules that will affect businesses.

    As a restitutional deterent, have the convited individuals pay restitution, and make it a lien. So if the “poor sap” gets out after 10 years in prison, and gets a job, a portion of every check is taken to pay back the company. Company go out of business? Then the funs are allocated towards a government sponsored “awareness” campaign.

    The government, in my opinion is WAAAAAY to soft on what the “people” may say about something. Public pressure makes them back down and soften the edge of something that is critical. The crooks know this, and will CONTINUE to exploit the weak government verbage and “interpretations”.I am sure they accept the very mild punishment that MAY be served up – in some cases if the money trail cannot be found, so the person goes to jail – maybe – and rich(er) because of the act.

    Some things you just have to drop heavy on the table and say, this is it. you don’t like it? Tough. Find something else to do in your spare time rather than wreak havoc on computer instruments that you do not physically have ownership of.

    1. admin says:
      March 18, 2013 at 7:23 pm

      The problem with your statement is that people are being prosecuted for felonies when they haven’t stolen anything. For example, violating a site’s TOS by using a fake name or persona if a real name is required gets prosecuted (think of the Laurie Drew case). Aaron Swartz violated TOS but didn’t take anything he couldn’t have obtained anyway, one file at a time, and there’s no proof as to what he was doing with the files. Then there’s “weev,” who just got sentenced for detecting a security hole, downloading data, and sending the data to journalists as proof.

      Should all of those cases be prosecuted as felonies with potentially long prison sentences? I don’t think so, but YMMV.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Why Dumping Sensitive Data on Network Shares is a Liability
  • A militarily degraded Iran may turn to asymmetrical warfare – raising risk of proxy and cyber attacks
  • Pro-Russian hackers disrupt Dutch government websites ahead of NATO summit
  • Iran-Linked Threat Actors Leak Visitors and Athletes’ Data from Saudi Games
  • UK: Oxford City Council still investigating cyberattack from earlier this month
  • Steelmaker Nucor Says Hackers Stole Data in Recent Attack
  • People’s Republic of China cyber threat activity: Cyber Threat Bulletin
  • Ukrainian Web3 security auditing company Hacken suffered an attack that allowed a hacker to create 900 million HAI tokens
  • McLaren provides written notice to 743,131 patients after ransomware attack in July 2024 (2)
  • A state forensics lab was leaking its files. Getting it locked down involved a number of people.

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Sky Views Personal Data as a Potential Weapon in IPTV Piracy War
  • Florida Used a Nationwide Surveillance Camera Network 250 Times To Aid in Immigration Arrests
  • Federal Court Strikes Down HIPAA Reproductive Health Care Privacy Rule
  • The Markup caught 4 more states sharing personal health data with Big Tech
  • Privacy in the Big Sky State: Montana’s Consumer Privacy Law Gets Amended
  • UK Passes Data Use and Access Regulation Bill
  • Officials defend Liberal bill that would force hospitals, banks, hotels to hand over data

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.