DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Montgomery Man Sentenced In Identity Theft Related State Income Tax Fraud

Posted on November 2, 2013 by Dissent

John Irving Wheeler, 31 years old, of Montgomery, was sentenced to serve 210 months of incarceration on October 31, 2013. Wheeler was also ordered to pay one million dollars in restitution to the States of Georgia and Michigan. Wheeler pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and mail fraud on April 1, 2013, based on his role in a stolen identity scheme to that resulted in Wheeler and others receiving fraudulent state income tax refunds.

According to the court documents, from February 2008 through at least November 2009, Wheeler and others stole identifications of other individuals, including their names, dates of birth, and Social Security numbers. Wheeler and his coconspirators would then use that information to electronically file fraudulent state income tax returns with numerous states, including Georgia and Michigan. The returns generated from the fraudulent state income tax refunds were either mailed or electronically transferred to Wheeler and his coconspirators. Bank records and information obtained from the Georgia Department of Revenue and the Michigan Department of Treasury showed that Wheeler and his coconspirators received $1,060,732 in fraudulent state income tax refunds. Agents also executed a search warrant at Wheeler’s residence and recovered over 300 stolen identities. Wheeler was attempting to flush paperwork containing the stolen identities down a toilet after agents arrived at Wheeler’s residence to execute the warrant.

The case was investigated by Special Agents of the United States Secret Service and the Alabama Alcohol Beverage Control Board. Assistant U.S. Attorney Todd Brown prosecuted the case.

Note that they do not tell us how or where the identity information was stolen or acquired. That information is not provided in the indictment that I downloaded from PACER nor any of the records available in the docket. Was this mail theft? An insider breach? What?  Why does DOJ often withhold this information from the public?

This post used information provided by the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Middle District of Alabama

 


Related:

  • Another plastic surgery practice fell prey to a cyberattack that acquired patient photos and info
  • NY: Gloversville hit by ransomware attack, paid ransom
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
  • TX: Kaufman County Faces Cybersecurity Attack: Courthouse Computer Operations Disrupted
  • KT Chief to Resign After Cybersecurity Breach Resolution
Category: Breach IncidentsID TheftU.S.

Post navigation

← North Georgia Tech Students Asked to be Alert After Possible Security Breach
Vendor’s printing error exposes TD Bank customers’ account numbers to other customers →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.