DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Is your firm violating the Data Protection Act or begging for a hack of its Twitter account? (updated)

Posted on August 20, 2014 by Dissent

ThreeUK, who claim to have a 45% share of all mobile traffic in the UK, has a social media presence on Facebook and Twitter. They also have a dangerous practice of requesting customers provide personal details such as full name, phone number, postcode, and date of birth via direct messages (DM) to their support team, e.g., this tweet to a customer:

@ThreeUK Is it taken directly from your bank account? Can you DM over the name, number, DOB, postcode for the account so I can check this. B

— ThreeUKSupport (@ThreeUKSupport) August 19, 2014

Yesterday, Quentyn Taylor tried to educate them that this practice was risky and might even violate Principle 7 of the UK’s Data Protection Act. Principle 7 states:

Appropriate technical and organisational measures shall be taken against unauthorised or unlawful processing of personal data and against accidental loss or destruction of, or damage to, personal data.

The UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office explains what that means in a guidance on their site.  Given how often we have seen corporate Twitter accounts hacked, can ThreeUK or any other corporate Twitter account really provide adequate security for personal information provided by DMs?  Or as Quentyn notes, is ThreeUK inviting problems with its practice: 

If you request your customers send you pii / passwords via twitter DM you had better hope your acct doesn’t get hacked… #databreach — Quentyn Taylor (@quentynblog) August 19, 2014

and:

In fact I would be surprised if #badguys aren’t looking for corp twitter accts that have requested pii from customers as takeover targets. — Quentyn Taylor (@quentynblog) August 19, 2014

I wouldn’t be surprised, either.

When neither @ThreeUK nor @ThreeUKSupport responded to Quentyn’s tweets, I tweeted:

@ThreeUKSupport I report on breaches. Please let me know when you’re hacked so I can report on stupidity of requesting #PII by DM. @ICOnews

— Dissent Doe (@PogoWasRight) August 19, 2014

So far, though, nothing’s changed, as this tweet to a customer from this morning illustrates:

@AndrewAyr …However if you DM your name, number, DOB and postcode – we can change this for you. >AM — ThreeUKSupport (@ThreeUKSupport) August 20, 2014

Obviously, I’m no expert on the UK’s Data Protection Act, but I do hope the ICO offers some comments on this issue – and that American corporations with Twitter social media teams also think long and hard about the risks here.

Thanks to Quentyn for making me aware of this matter.

UPDATE:  @ThreeUKSupport did answer Quentyn later today:

@quentynblog Hi Quentyn – We’ve been assured this is acceptable by our DPA team. Please let us know if you’ve any more questions. >RW

— ThreeUKSupport (@ThreeUKSupport) August 20, 2014

I wonder if the DPA team consulted with the ICO. In any event, even if it is legal (and I’m still not sure it is),  it’s a risky behavior that I would recommend avoiding.

Category: Commentaries and Analyses

Post navigation

← FTC Settlement Requires Fandango and Credit Karma to Establish Comprehensive Security Programs to Protect Consumers’ Sensitive Personal Information
Patient's Snooping Claim Amounts to Defamation →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • AT&T gets preliminary approval for $177 million data breach settlement
  • Aflac notifies SEC of breach suspected to be work of Scattered Spider
  • Former JBLM soldier pleads guilty to attempting to share military secrets with China
  • No, the 16 billion credentials leak is not a new data breach — a wake-up call about fake news
  • Tonga’s health system hit by cyberattack (1)
  • Russia Expert Falls Prey to Elite Hackers Disguised as US Officials
  • Proposed class action settlement in In re Netgain Technology litigation
  • Qilin Offers “Call a lawyer” Button For Affiliates Attempting To Extort Ransoms From Victims Who Won’t Pay
  • Ireland’s Data Protection Commission publishes 2024 Annual Report
  • The headlines suggested Freedman Healthcare suffered a ransomware attack that affected patient data. The reality was quite different.

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Privacy in the Big Sky State: Montana’s Consumer Privacy Law Gets Amended
  • UK Passes Data Use and Access Regulation Bill
  • Officials defend Liberal bill that would force hospitals, banks, hotels to hand over data
  • US Judge Invalidates Biden Rule Protecting Privacy for Abortions
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data
  • DOJ Seeks More Time on Tower Dumps

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report