DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

California Privacy Advocates Urge Defeat of Federal Data Breach Notice Bill

Posted on April 15, 2015 by Dissent

Six California privacy and consumer groups have called on members of the US House Energy and Commerce Committee to oppose federal legislation that would wipe out California’s landmark data breach notification laws. The House Committee may hear the Data Security and Breach Notification Act of 2015 as early as Wednesday, April 15. California Congress members on the House committee are Lois Capps, Tony Cardenas, Anna Eshoo, Doris Matsui and Jerry McNerney. Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, Consumer Federation of California, Consumer Watchdog, World Privacy Forum, The Utility Reform Network (TURN), and Consumer Action are urging the members of Congress to defeat the proposed federal bill.

California was the first state to implement a data breach notice law in 2003, and has since amended the law several times to address changing threats. It is among the strongest such laws in the country, and offers Californians significant consumer protections. It has served as a model for legislation enacted on dozens of states. The inadequate standards of the federal Data Security and Breach Notification Act of 2015 would preempt and replace the more protective state breach notice laws.

Consumer rights advocates point out that the proposed federal legislation:

  • Contains a significantly narrower definition of personal information than existing California law, eliminating several categories of personally identifiable data, including certain sensitive medical and health insurance information.
  • Ties a breach notification to a breached business’ subjective guess work regarding possible financial harm, rather than California’s requirement of a consumer notice whenever records are likely acquired by unauthorized people.
  • Eliminates the California requirement that a breached entity provide notice to the California Attorney General.
  • Strips California security breach victims of the right to sue to recover damages.
  • Removes a California requirement for breached entities to provide identity theft prevention and mitigation services to residents whose private information is hacked or exposed.

Link here to a sample letter. Privacy advocates sent identical letters to Congress members Capps, Cardenas, Eshoo, Matsui and McNerney.

SOURCE: Consumer Federation of California

Category: Breach LawsU.S.

Post navigation

← FL: Teacher’s laptop stolen in rash of St. Augustine Beach car burglaries
Right-wing group blamed for posting top law officials’ info →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ireland’s Data Protection Commission publishes 2024 Annual Report
  • The headlines suggested Freedman Healthcare suffered a ransomware attack that affected patient data. The reality was quite different.
  • Runsafe report: Medical device cyberattacks threaten patient care, strain budgets, top concern for healthcare sector
  • Ryuk ransomware’s initial access expert extradited to the U.S. from Ukraine
  • Alleged Geisinger hacker will defend himself pro se.
  • Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare reveals it was also impacted by Cerner/Legacy Oracle cyberattack
  • Hospital cyberattack investigation complete, no formal review needed (1)
  • Largest Ever Seizure of Funds Related to Crypto Confidence Scams
  • IMPACT: 170 patients harmed as a result of Qilin’s ransomware attack on NHS vendor Synnovis
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • US Judge Invalidates Biden Rule Protecting Privacy for Abortions
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data
  • DOJ Seeks More Time on Tower Dumps
  • Your household smart products must respect your privacy – including your air fryer
  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report