DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

MO: Cellphone repair shop employee arrested for invasion of privacy

Posted on June 25, 2015 by Dissent

Joe McLean reports:

A Jefferson City man faces charges of taking and sharing explicit photos of several women.

A woman told Jefferson City police on June 11 that sexually explicit photos of her were shared with a group of people without her consent.

The victim had recently taken her cellphone to iRepair, a cellphone repair shop in Jefferson City, for a routine repair.

Read more on ABC17.

h/t, @VERISDB


Related:

  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • Before Their Telegram Channel Was Banned Again, ScatteredLAPSUS$Hunters Dropped Files Doxing Government Employees (2)
  • Massachusetts hospitals Heywood, Athol say outage was a cybersecurity incident
  • Data BreachesProsper Data Breach Impacts 17.6 Million Accounts
  • Heritage Provider Network $49.99M Class Action Settlement
Category: Business SectorInsiderTheftU.S.

Post navigation

← Florida telemarketer, under FTC watch, suffers data breach
Expedia warns users about ‘unauthorized access’ of name, phone, email and booking info →

1 thought on “MO: Cellphone repair shop employee arrested for invasion of privacy”

  1. IA Eng says:
    June 25, 2015 at 1:30 pm

    Ummmm, Some people are clueless. if you have naked photos of yourself on a phone, and your going to allow others to handle your, errrr phone without supervision, one would THINK that removing the photos might be a GOOD IDEA. This may be a fine line as to how far a repair center can go to ensure the repairs to the phone are done right. Sure, they should have done the good deed, say WHOA ! and immediately closed the photo down and left it at that.

    I don’t know what this person looks like, but it must have been good enough to take a chance at showing off her style to others. Now, the employee will probably be branded as untrustworthy when it comes to material that should be closely guarded. Sure it’s an invasion of privacy once the employee forwarded the photos. If he viewed them himself while working on the device, all he had to do is confront the customer, and say something to the effect “while working on your phone, we tested several options to make sure the repairs were done correct, and I stumbled upon these photos (show her one on the device). ” Wait for a response, and if there isn’t any mushroom cloud or blood red embarrassment, there may be an opportunity to carry the conversation further…….

    Being upfront and honest is hard to come by now a days, but it still exists. It builds a trust between the customer and the business, and goes a long way. Word of mouth is the best advertisement, and if this episode was handled better, it could have been a big positive rather than a huge negative.

    I understand selfies are trendy and hip, but commmon, if your going to have other people look at your phone……… Most people are curious, even though it may not be the smartest move on both accounts, none of this would have been an issue – in this documented case – if the photos would have been removed prior to having the phone serviced.

    Some how it may boil down to a targeted attack to sue a business. Time will tell.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.