DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

What did CSU do to verify vendors’ data security – and what might FTC do?

Posted on September 9, 2015 by Dissent

When California State University decided to purchase a We End Violence program, Agent of Change, they reportedly did consider data security. The Press-Telegram reports:

Laurie Weidner, spokeswoman for the Chancellor’s Office, said CSU has not terminated its relationship with We End Violence, which administered the training program called Agent of Change. The vendor was one of three offered to campuses, when the sexual violence prevention program was rolled out, she said.

Weidner said in an email the vendor was one of several reviewed and was recommended by the White House task force on campus sexual violence prevention.

Did the White House task force review data security of the products? 

“The vendor agreed to the required contract terms and conditions regarding information security, including accepting CSU definitions for what constitutes confidential data, and the requirement to maintain the privacy (of) confidential information,” Weidner said.

And what, exactly, were those terms and conditions? DataBreaches.net has emailed We End Violence to ask whether the sensitive student information was  stored in plain text. Did CSU know the data would be stored in clear text? Did they accept that? 

CSU has no plans to change the screening process of vendors delivering the online sexual assault prevention training, Weidner said.

So CSU has no plans to learn from this experience by investigating data security more before they make arrangements with a vendor? 

“The breach occurred with one vendor not the others,” she said in the email. “The CSU has other contracts with other vendors, and there has been no data exposure.”

Perhaps she should add, “… yet.” 

Keep in mind that all enrolled students in the 23-campus CSU system are reportedly required by federal law and the state auditor to take sexual assault prevention training. That is a tremendous number of students who may have their sensitive and/or personal information exposed through a vendor, as CSU’s statement about over 79,000 students being impacted illustrates.

If the U.S. Education Department and Congress are serious about data security and EdTech, maybe they should investigate the We End Violence breach and all the vendors’ contracts and assurances of data security (if they have not done so already).

And while the FTC cannot take action against CSU, it does have authority to enforce data security in the vendors. Maybe they, too, should look into whether We End Violence has a reasonable security program or if they violated Section 5 by failure to deploy commercially reasonable and appropriate safeguards for sensitive information that left consumers at risk of substantial injury.

No related posts.

Category: Commentaries and AnalysesEducation SectorOf NoteSubcontractorU.S.

Post navigation

← More TransformPOS clients possibly affected by security incident? (updated)
In: Woman arrested for hacking into ex-employer’s computers →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ransomware in Italy, strike at the Diskstation gang: hacker group leader arrested in Milan
  • A year after cyber attack, Columbus could invest $23M in cybersecurity upgrades
  • Gravity Forms Breach Hits 1M WordPress Sites
  • Stormous claims to have protected health info on 600,000 patients of North Country Healthcare. The data appear fake. (1)
  • Back from the Brink: District Court Clears Air Regarding Individualized Damages Assessment in Data Breach Cases
  • Multiple lawsuits filed against Doyon Ltd over April 2024 data breach and late notification
  • Chinese hackers suspected in breach of powerful DC law firm
  • Qilin Emerged as The Most Active Group, Exploiting Unpatched Fortinet Vulnerabilities
  • CISA tags Citrix Bleed 2 as exploited, gives agencies a day to patch
  • McDonald’s McHire leak involving ‘123456’ admin password exposes 64 million applicant chat records

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Here’s What a Reproductive Police State Looks Like
  • Meta investors, Zuckerberg to square off at $8 billion trial over alleged privacy violations
  • Australian law is now clearer about clinicians’ discretion to tell our patients’ relatives about their genetic risk
  • The ICO’s AI and biometrics strategy
  • Trump Border Czar Boasts ICE Can ‘Briefly Detain’ People Based On ‘Physical Appearance’
  • DeleteMyInfo Wins 2025 Digital Privacy Excellence Award from Internet Safety Council
  • TikTok Loses First Appeal Against £12.7M ICO Fine, Faces Second Investigation by DPC

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.