DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

(update) TN: improper disposal of medical records (update 2)

Posted on May 19, 2009 by Dissent

Karen Zatkulak updates this story previously covered here:

[…]

But police say these medical documents do mention several local facilities. Weary says, “Some procedures may have been performed at Hutcheson, Memorial, and Erlanger.”

Weary says this case is now being investigated by federal officials who regulate HIPAA violations, and right now, police are not blaming anyone, or any hospital. “Mentioning those hospitals has nothing to do with or nothing to say that these particular hospitals have anything to do with the dumping of these files.”

Monday, Hutcheson Medical Facility released a statement on their website saying the information came from a plastic surgeon who worked in Chattanooga, but moved to North Carolina and died in 2007. We asked Sergeant Weary about that statement, but she would not comment. “To put blame or attribute this to one specific doctor, no we can’t adequately say, we can say that several doctors names were seen on the files during the time that we were collecting the files.”

While police say the documents are sitting secure while the investigation continues… we wondered who should be telling patients that their privacy may have been violated.

Good question. If it should turn out that those who created the files are deceased or non-locatable, who should notify the patients? Someone dumped those files there, but it could be a firm with no connection to healthcare. So… should the party who exposed the papers have the responsibility for notifying? If it’s someone who bought out a storage unit, do you really want them going through the medical files to make the notifications?


Related:

  • Safaricom-Backed M-TIBA Victim of a Possible Data Breach Affecting Millions of Kenyans
  • Another plastic surgery practice fell prey to a cyberattack that acquired patient photos and info
  • NY: Gloversville hit by ransomware attack, paid ransom
  • Two U.K. teenagers appear in court over Transport of London cyber attack
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
Category: Breach IncidentsExposureHealth DataPaperU.S.

Post navigation

← Court issues arrest warrant for teen's mother
(update) IN: Computer Glitch Blamed For Credit Card Breach →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.