DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

NJ: Computer stolen from Inspira Medical Center Vineland (updated)

Posted on December 25, 2013 by Dissent

UPDATE: There was no patient data on the computer.

Original post:

Yesterday, Don E. Woods reported:

Police are investigating the theft of a computer, according to reports, that took place from the radiology department in the regional medical center.

The computer may have contained personal records and information, police said, which are password protected.

The theft occurred at Inspira Medical Center Vineland sometime on Monday, reports indicated, when it was taken from an unsecured filing room in the radiology department.

Medical center personnel were investigating whether the computer actually contained patient information.

Today, The Daily Journal provides a self-contradictory report. First they state:

A computer containing personal records and other information about patients was stolen from Cumberland County’s biggest medical facility, police said.

Two sentences later, they report:

The computer was password-protected but did contain patient information, an Inspira employee told police.

Inspira spokesman Greg Potter said they health system was aware of the theft and is “still evaluating whether there was patient data on the computer.”

So does the computer contain unencrypted PHI? There is no statement up on the medical center’s web site at the time of this posting.

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Frustrated with SnapChat’s non-response to their vulnerability report, researchers go public
TX: Former Cuero city secretary charged with intercepting police emails →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Credit Control Corporation data allegedly from 9.1 million consumers listed for sale on forum
  • Copilot AI Bug Could Leak Sensitive Data via Email Prompts
  • FTC Provides Guidance on Updated Safeguards Rule
  • Sentara Health terminates remote employees after realizing they couldn’t be sure who was doing the work.
  • Hackers Break Into Car Sharing App, 8.4 Million Users Affected
  • Cyberattack pushes German napkin company into insolvency
  • WMATA Train Operators Arrested in Health Care Fraud Scheme
  • Washington Post investigating cyberattack on journalists, WSJ reports
  • Resource: State Data Breach Notification Laws – June 2025
  • WestJet investigates cyberattack disrupting internal systems

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.