DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Excellus hack: why so long to detect it, members ask

Posted on November 8, 2015 by Dissent

Steve Orr has a follow-up on the Excellus BlueCross BlueShield data breach that was disclosed in September, but the scant details still available will doubtless continue to frustrate those who want to know how the breach occurred and why it took almost 20 months for Excellus to detect it.  And the available facts serve as a reminder that encryption does not prevent all breaches.

The Excellus breach was one of the largest in the healthcare sector, affecting over 10 million members and their dependents. It may also have impacted Highmark BlueCard holders who obtained services from Excellus providers. The initial attack reportedly occurred on December 23, 2013, but was not detected until August, 2015.

By now, about a dozen lawsuits have been filed against Excellus and its parent company, Lifetime Healthcare.

From the git-go, Excellus claimed that this was a “sophisticated” attack. And while that phrase may be over-used, frankly, if Mandiant is having problems figuring out what happened and how, Excellus may be right.

Unlike some other big breaches in the healthcare sector, spear phishing does not appear to have been involved in obtaining employee passwords, at least according to an Excellus spokesperson.  But however they got in, the attackers were able to plant malware on the systems that enabled acquisition of employee login credentials. Orr reports:

The user accounts that were compromised at Excellus were of employees with high-level administrative access, which allowed them to roam freely through company data. The company told Nozzolio that the hackers could have unlocked any encrypted data they found “because of the type of access the attacker possibly had.”

Forensic analysis by Mandiant indicated that the hackers maintained access until May 11, 2015. It’s not clear what may have happened on that date that prevented further access.

Even then, Excellus did not become aware of the intrusion for another three months, until August 5, 2015.  They announced the breach on September 9, 2015.

Read more on Democrat & Chronicle.


Related:

  • Two U.K. teenagers appear in court over Transport of London cyber attack
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Confidence in ransomware recovery is high but actual success rates remain low
  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
  • TX: Kaufman County Faces Cybersecurity Attack: Courthouse Computer Operations Disrupted
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
Category: Health DataMalwareU.S.

Post navigation

← Data from the TalkTalk data breach up for sale – Daily Mail
Hacking of Twitter accounts for political purposes continues →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Des Moines Man Charged with Computer Fraud
  • CrowdStrike catches insider feeding information to ScatteredLapsus$Hunters
  • Two suspected Scattered Spider hackers plead not guilty over Transport for London cyberattack
  • Attleboro investigating ‘cybersecurity incident’ impacting city’s IT systems
  • Fired techie admits sabotaging ex-employer, causing $862K in damage
  • Threat actors have reportedly launched yet another campaign involving an application connected to Salesforce
  • Russian hackers target IVF clinics across UK used by thousands of couples
  • US, allies sanction Russian bulletproof hosting services for ransomware support
  • Researchers claim ‘largest leak ever’ after uncovering WhatsApp enumeration flaw
  • Large medical lab in South Africa suffers multiple data breaches

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Cole v. Quest Diagnostics: The Third Circuit Weighs in on Pixels, Privacy, and Medical Data
  • Closing the Privacy Gap: HIPRA Targets Health Apps and Wearables
  • Researchers claim ‘largest leak ever’ after uncovering WhatsApp enumeration flaw
  • CIPL Publishes Discussion Paper Comparing U.S. State Privacy Law Definitions of Personal Data and Sensitive Data
  • India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 brought into force

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.