DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Wyndham caves, settles charges with FTC (updated)

Posted on December 9, 2015 by Dissent

I did not see this coming.  Wyndham has settled FTC charges, bringing an end to a closely watched court case involving FTC’s authority to enforce data security. The case was the first one that hadn’t resulted in a consent order. Today’s settlement leaves only the LabMD as a challenge to FTC’s authority to enforce data security, although the Wyndham and LabMD cases raise slightly different issues and the LabMD case is still an administrative proceeding at this point.

The FTC’s press release:

Wyndham Hotels and Resorts has agreed to settle FTC charges that the company’s security practices unfairly exposed the payment card information of hundreds of thousands of consumers to hackers in three separate data breaches.

Under the terms of the settlement, the company will establish a comprehensive information security program designed to protect cardholder data – including payment card numbers, names and expiration dates.  In addition, the company is required to conduct annual information security audits and maintain safeguards in connections to its franchisees’ servers.

“This settlement marks the end of a significant case in the FTC’s efforts to protect consumers from the harm caused by unreasonable data security,” said FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez. “Not only will it provide important protection to consumers, but the court rulings in the case have affirmed the vital role the FTC plays in this important area.”

The proposed stipulated federal court order requires Wyndham Hotels and Resorts to obtain annual security audits of its information security program that conform to the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard for certification of a company’s security program.  In addition, the order requires Wyndham’s audit to:

  • certify the “untrusted” status of franchisee networks, to prevent future hackers from using the same method used in the company’s prior breaches;
  • certify the extent of compliance with a formal risk assessment process that will analyze the possible data security risks faced by the company; and
  • certify that the auditor is qualified, independent and free from conflicts of interest.

The order also requires that in the event Wyndham suffers another data breach affecting more than 10,000 payment card numbers, they must obtain an assessment of the breach and provide that assessment to the FTC within 10 days.

The order provides that if Wyndham successfully obtains the necessary compliance certifications, it will be deemed in compliance with the comprehensive information security program provision of the order. That provision is not effective, however, in the event that Wyndham in any way misleads or provides false information during the annual audit and assessment process.

Wyndham’s obligations under the settlement are in place for 20 years.

The Commission vote approving the proposed stipulated order was 4-0. The FTC filed the proposed stipulated order in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.

NOTE: Stipulated orders have the force of law when approved and signed by the District Court judge.

Wyndham’s Press Release:

Wyndham Worldwide Corporation (NYSE: WYN) today issued the following statement regarding its settlement with the Federal Trade Commission resulting from the FTC’s investigation of data breaches that occurred at some Wyndham Hotels and Resorts-brand hotel properties from 2008 to 2010.

“We are pleased to reach this settlement with the FTC, which does not hold Wyndham liable for any violations, nor require Wyndham to pay any monetary relief. We chose to defend against this litigation based on our strong belief that we have had reasonable data security in place, and that the FTC’s position could have had a negative impact on the franchise business model. This settlement resolves these issues, and sets a standard for what the government considers reasonable data security of payment card information. Safeguarding personal information remains a top priority for our company at a time when companies and government agencies are increasingly the targets of cyberattacks.”

Several years ago, Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, LLC was the victim of sophisticated cyberattacks by criminal hackers, who accessed customer information at certain Wyndham Hotels and Resorts-brand hotel properties. The Company promptly alerted law enforcement agencies, retained computer forensic experts, implemented significant security enhancements, and assisted franchised Wyndham Hotels and Resorts-brand hotels in reinforcing their information security. Wyndham also made prompt efforts to notify the hotel customers whose information may have been compromised, and offered them credit monitoring services. Importantly, to date Wyndham has not received any indication that any hotel customers experienced financial loss as a result of these attacks. The FTC conducted an investigation of this matter and Wyndham cooperated fully. Following are the key terms of the settlement between Wyndham and the FTC announced today:

Wyndham will not pay any monetary relief. The Company is granted a Safe Harbor if it continues to meet certain requirements for “reasonable information security” outlined in the FTC’s consent order. The consent order applies only to payment card information, and does not apply to any other categories of personally identifiable information. Payment Card Industry (“PCI”) certification will satisfy Wyndham’s reporting requirement and provide the basis for the Safe Harbor. The duration of Wyndham’s obligations under the consent order will in no event be longer than 20 years, and in several areas will be shorter.

Update: From the FTC’s site (the appendices relate to PCI standards):

[Proposed] Stipulated Order for Injunction (603.64 KB)
Appendix A to [Proposed] Stipulated Order for Injunction (17.32 MB)
Appendix B to [Proposed] Stipulated Order for Injunction (4.7 MB)

Related posts:

  • FTC Files Complaint Against Wyndham Hotels For Failure to Protect Consumers’ Personal Information
  • Transcript of Oral Argument in FTC v. Wyndham
  • FTC Takes Action Against Drizly and its CEO James Cory Rellas for Security Failures that Exposed Data of 2.5 Million Consumers
  • (update 2) Only Wyndham-branded hotels involved in three breaches
Category: Business SectorHackOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← TX: Woodland Heights employee investigated for stealing 450 patients’ info
Hackers Could Take Control Of Your Car, But You Can’t Sue Carmakers For That Risk →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ex-student charged with wave of cyber attacks on Sydney uni
  • Detaining Hackers Before the Crime? Tamil Nadu’s Supreme Court Approves Preventive Custody for Cyber Offenders
  • Potential Cyberattack Scrambles Columbia University Computer Systems
  • 222,000 customer records allegedly from Manhattan Parking Group leaked
  • Breaches have consequences (sometimes) (1)
  • Kansas City Man Pleads Guilty for Hacking a Non-Profit
  • British national “IntelBroker” charged with causing $25 million in damages; U.S. seeks his extradition from France
  • France issues press statement about arrest of ShinyHunters members
  • Patients Allege Home Delivery Pharmacy Failed to Timely Notify Them of Data Breach
  • Hackers breach Norwegian dam, open valve at full capacity

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Microsoft’s Departing Privacy Chief Calls for Regulator Outreach
  • Nestle USA Settles Suit Over Job-Application Medical Questions
  • NY Attorney General James Affirms Hospitals Must Provide Access to Emergency Abortion Care
  • How Internet of Things devices affect your privacy – even when they’re not yours
  • Sky Views Personal Data as a Potential Weapon in IPTV Piracy War
  • Florida Used a Nationwide Surveillance Camera Network 250 Times To Aid in Immigration Arrests
  • Federal Court Strikes Down HIPAA Reproductive Health Care Privacy Rule

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.