DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

California public health dept. announces lost tape had medical and personal info on residents and workers

Posted on December 15, 2010 by Dissent

Wow – two state departments of public health reveal breaches in a 24-hour period?  First it was Connecticut, reported on this blog earlier today, and now California.  Here’s a statement from the California Department of Public Health:

The California Department of Public Health (CDPH) has reported to state authorities that a missing magnetic tape, delivered from one department facility to another, has been lost. The magnetic tape contained medical or other personal information for up to 2,550 facility residents, CDPH employees and health care workers, and was unencrypted.

CDPH is currently notifying affected individuals. CDPH will advise each individual about how to protect themselves from identity theft. At this point, there is no evidence that unauthorized parties have acquired or accessed personal information.

“The privacy of medical and other personal information is a top priority for CDPH,” said CDPH Director Dr. Mark Horton. “We immediately implemented procedure and policy changes to prevent such errors from occurring in the future. We take any breach of secure documents very seriously, and we regret this occurrence. We will redouble our efforts to ensure that everyone’s personal information is properly protected.”

The incident occurred when a CDPH field office in West Covina, in the Los Angeles area, sent a magnetic tape to the central office in Sacramento as part of the procedure for backing up its computer data. The magnetic tape was unlabeled and was sent via U.S. Postal Service.

On September 27, 2010, CDPH received the mailed envelope which was reported to be unsealed and empty. CDPH immediately reported the breach to the Information Security Office and began an investigation of the incident. On November 23, 2010, CDPH completed compiling the list of individuals whose medical or other personal information may have been compromised as a result of the loss of the tape.

The confidential information on the lost tape includes: employee e-mails, investigative reports, background information on health care workers, the names of health care facility residents and some information on their medical diagnosis, and social security numbers for CDPH employees and some facility residents and health care workers. CDPH has implemented policy and procedure changes to minimize the likelihood of recurrence and is researching options which would eliminate the need for a back up tape.

For more information about identity theft and protection options, log on to the California Office of Privacy Protection Web site at http://www.privacy.ca.gov.

Hat-tip, Los Angeles Times

So… will the state fine itself for not notifying individuals within 5 days of the discovery of the breach?


Related:

  • Two U.K. teenagers appear in court over Transport of London cyber attack
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • Massachusetts hospitals Heywood, Athol say outage was a cybersecurity incident
  • Heritage Provider Network $49.99M Class Action Settlement
  • Integris Health Agrees to $30 Million Settlement Over 2023 Data Breach
Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Personal info on drug informants, suspects, others exposed in Colo.
California public health dept. announces lost tape had medical and personal info on residents and workers →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Sue The Hackers – Google Sues Over Phishing as a Service
  • Princeton University Data Breach Impacts Alumni, Students, Employees
  • Eurofiber admits crooks swiped data from French unit after cyberattack
  • Five major changes to the regulation of cybersecurity in the UK under the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill
  • French agency Pajemploi reports data breach affecting 1.2M people
  • From bad to worse: Doctor Alliance hacked again by same threat actor (1)
  • Surveillance tech provider Protei was hacked, its data stolen, and its website defaced
  • Checkout.com Discloses Data Breach After Extortion Attempt
  • Washington Post hack exposes personal data of John Bolton, almost 10,000 others
  • Draft UK Cyber Security and Resilience Bill Enters UK Parliament

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • CIPL Publishes Discussion Paper Comparing U.S. State Privacy Law Definitions of Personal Data and Sensitive Data
  • India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 brought into force
  • Five major changes to the regulation of cybersecurity in the UK under the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill
  • Keeping Cool When ICE Arrives: Basic Raid Response Strategies for Laboratories
  • IRS Accessed Massive Database of Americans Flights Without a Warrant

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.