DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority notifies patients of mailing error

Posted on October 7, 2016 by Dissent

UW Health announced today that it is sending letters to certain patients about a privacy incident. UW Health learned on August 3, 2016, that patient satisfaction surveys were addressed “To the parents or guardians [patient’s name]” of some adult patients and mailed between July 29, 2016, and August 2, 2016. The enclosed cover letter was accurately addressed to the patient, and included the name of the healthcare provider who treated the patient.

UW Health determined that the cause was an improperly formatted computer file and quickly prevented any further misaddressed mailings from being sent to patients.

This incident did not affect all UW Health patients, only some patients who came to one of UW Health facilities or clinics and received the letter.

In response to this incident, UW Health has re-educated staff involved in order to prevent this from happening again in the future. More information: Notice to Patients Regarding Mis-Addressed Patient Satisfaction Surveys
Date Published: 09/30/2016

The corresponding notice to patients:

Notice to Patients Regarding Mis-Addressed Patient Satisfaction Surveys

UW Health is committed to maintaining the privacy and security of the patient information we maintain. Regrettably, this notice is regarding a recent mailing error we discovered after sending out patient satisfaction surveys to UW Health patients.

Between July 29, 2016, and August 2, 2016, we mailed patient satisfaction surveys to UW Health patients who had recently received care at our facilities and clinics. On August 3, 2016, we became aware that the survey and cover letter were mailed to the patient in an envelope mistakenly addressed with the prefix: “To the parent or guardian of [patient’s name],” rather than directly to the patient. The enclosed cover letter was accurately addressed to the patient, and included the name of the healthcare provider that treated the patient. We were able to determine that the cause was an improperly formatted computer file and quickly prevented any further misaddressed mailings from being sent to our patients.

This did not affect all patients, only some patients who came to one of our facilities or clinics and received the letter.

UW Health began mailing letters to affected patients on September 30, 2016, and has established a dedicated call center to answer any questions they may have. If you believe you are affected but do not receive a letter by October 15, 2016, please call 1-844-607-1694 between 8am and 8pm Central Time, Monday through Friday.

We apologize for the error and regret any confusion or concern it may have caused. To help prevent something like this from happening in the future we have re-educated the staff involved.
Date Published: 09/30/2016

According to their report to HHS, which was just posted today by HHS, there were 6,923 patients notified of the error.


Related:

  • Landmark civil penalty of AU$5.8 million issued under Australia’s Privacy Act
  • How many courts have had sealed and sensitive files exposed by one vendor's error?
  • Revealed: Afghan data breach after MoD official left laptop open on train
  • Snowflake Loses Two More Bids to Dismiss Data Breach Plaintiffs
  • US company with access to biggest telecom firms uncovers breach by nation-state hackers
  • The 4TB time bomb: when EY's cloud went public (and what it taught us)
Category: ExposureHealth DataU.S.

Post navigation

← Fife police officer’s data protection breach trial begins
Joint DHS and ODNI Election Security Statement →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.