DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

NC: Wake County learns that 1,900 employees affected by breach at former benefits administrator

Posted on February 15, 2020 by Dissent

Posted to Wake County’s website yesterday (h/t, WDTV/Yahoo)

Wake County’s former flexible benefit spending accounts administrator, Interactive Medical Systems, recently reported that it experienced a data security breach that disclosed the personal information of nearly 1,900 Wake County Government employees to an unauthorized third party.

“We sincerely regret any inconvenience or concern that this matter may have caused,” said Eric Ludwig, president of Interactive Medical Systems.

IMS is in the process of sending letters via first class mail to the affected employees to notify them about the breach and inform them of protective measures they can take. IMS will also offer a hotline that affected employees can call to ask questions and express concerns.

The breach exposed the names, dates of service and partial social security numbers of the majority of the 1,900 affected employees. A small group had their names, addresses and full social security numbers exposed, and they will be eligible for a year of free credit monitoring from IMS.

No personal information of any other Wake County employees or residents was affected.

“It’s important to note that this was not a breach of a county system, nor was it caused by a county employee,” said Wake County’s Chief Information and Innovation Officer Bill Greeves. “IMS has confirmed the breach was the result of a phishing attack against an IMS employee.”

The breach occurred from July 19, 2019 to Dec. 31, 2019. IMS discovered it on Dec. 31, 2019. IMS mailed a letter to Wake County on Jan. 29, 2020 confirming that a breach had occurred.

To prevent further breaches, IMS has taken the following actions:

  • Upgraded security systems;
  • Implemented stricter password policies; and
  • Increased security training for employees.

Wake County’s contract with IMS ended on Dec. 31, 2019. The decision to change vendors was not connected to the security breach.


Related:

  • Two U.K. teenagers appear in court over Transport of London cyber attack
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Gatineau gymnastics centre warns members of possible data breach
  • Data breach in 42 Latvian municipalities: DVI imposes 300,000 euro fine on ZZ Dats
  • Kaufman County's data breach was their second one in three weeks
  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
Category: Breach IncidentsGovernment SectorSubcontractorU.S.

Post navigation

← Threat Vector Number 1
GA: DeKalb officers accused of selling accident reports resign after arrests →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.