DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Georgia dental practice discovers it was attacked by ransomware when the attackers call them on the phone

Posted on December 3, 2020 by Dissent

Well, this is a bit different from what I am used to reading.

Galstan & Ward Family and Cosmetic Dentistry (Galstan & Ward) is a dental practice in Georgia.  On  September 9, 2020, they learned that they had been a victim of a ransomware attack — or an attempted attack — when they got a phone call from a group claiming to have attacked them and demanding a ransom.

That was literally news to the practice. Prior to that call, Drs. Galstan and Ward had noticed some anomalies with their computer system and had hired an IT vendor to wipe the server and reinstall from backup. So there had been no significant disruption of service or loss of data. Or so they thought.

In a notification to patients of November 13, the practice explained that they discovered that the intrusion had occurred between August 31 and September 1.  On September 11, they learned that several files from their server were posted to a website on the dark web. The files reportedly did not contain any information concerning patients.

After becoming aware of the incident, Galstan & Ward contacted outside counsel, “who immediately engaged a computer security firm to conduct a forensic analysis and provide remediation services.”

Their analysis confirmed that the restored server was free from any malware. The security firm could find no evidence that confidential patient data stored in Galstan & Ward’s dental practice software system was accessed or acquired. Additional investigation did not find evidence of acquisition or access of confidential patient information.

But of course, we know that’s often the case — that investigations do not find proof of access or exfiltration and then months later, we see data on the dark web.

In any event, out of an abundance of caution (they say), and because their software stores patient names, social security numbers, dates of birth, addresses, and dental records using a data masking technique, they are notifying all patients who might be impacted and offering them credit monitoring and identity theft restoration services through IDX.

The incident was reported to HHS on November 6 as impacting 10,759 patients.  The doctors’ notification does not identify what kind of ransomware was used.

Update:  This was an attack by Conti threat actors, who uploaded approximately 20 files as proof of access. The files do not appear to contain PHI, but rather templates for files and documents from the dental office’s Dentrix system.


Related:

  • UN Cybercrime Convention to be signed in Hanoi to tackle global offences
  • Two U.K. teenagers appear in court over Transport of London cyber attack
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Confidence in ransomware recovery is high but actual success rates remain low
  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
  • TX: Kaufman County Faces Cybersecurity Attack: Courthouse Computer Operations Disrupted
Category: Health DataHIPAAMalwareOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← Attacked by ransomware, Golden Gate Regional Center continues providing services to developmentally disabled clients
Verizon has been leaking customers’ personal information for days (at least) →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.