DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

“We are apolitical” — DarkSide threat actors

Posted on May 10, 2021 by Dissent

By now, probably everyone has heard about the Colonial Pipeline security incident that has been linked to threat actors known as DarkSide.

On April 12, this site published an email chat with DarkSide. If you missed that chat write-up, you can read it here.  On May 8, after the mainstream media reported that the Colonial Pipeline incident had been attributed to DarkSide by those familiar with the matter, I reached out to the threat actors to ask for a comment or response.  As I tweeted and reported, they responded, “Hello, no comments,” but then immediately sent another reply explaining, “At the time of negotiations and in the case of payment, we do not  disclose information about the transaction.”

That was their only acknowledgement by that point that they were involved.

Today, they have issued a statement on their leak site:

DarkSide Press Message

About the latest news.

10.05.2021

We are apolitical, we do not participate in geopolitics, do not need to tie us with a defined goverment and look for other our motives.

Our goal is to make money, and not creating problems for society.
From today we introduce moderation and check each company that our partners want to encrypt to avoid social consequences in the future.

That press statement is consistent with what they had stated in our email interview when I asked them if they ever had regretted any attack. They responded how they added funeral homes and crematoria to their exclusion list because they had regretted what a partner had done. Now they say they will start moderation to check companies that their partners want to encrypt.

Chalk this up as purely opinion, but I think it’s likely that they are quite serious about that. Since Colonial Pipeline is private industry and not a state/government entity, they probably did not consider it as infrastructure or political as much as just a typical big (lucrative) target by a partner.

Could DarkSide be state-related? Could they have lied about that? Sure. But then do we say the same thing about every threat actor group that may speak Russian? Is there any evidence that DarkSide has had any political or governmental targets?

Category: Business SectorCommentaries and AnalysesMalwareOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← Tulsa, Oklahoma and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute disclose ransomware incidents
No: Volue ASA hit by Ryuk ransomware →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • New evidence links long-running hacking group to Indian government
  • Zaporizhzhia Cyber ​​Police Exposes Hacker Who Caused Millions in Losses to Victims by Mining Cryptocurrency
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Google: Hackers target Salesforce accounts in data extortion attacks
  • The US Grid Attack Looming on the Horizon
  • US govt login portal could be one cyberattack away from collapse, say auditors
  • Two Men Sentenced to Prison for Aggravated Identity Theft and Computer Hacking Crimes
  • 100,000 UK taxpayer accounts hit in £47m phishing attack on HMRC
  • CISA Alert: Updated Guidance on Play Ransomware
  • Almost one year later, U.S. Dermatology Partners is still not being very transparent about their 2024 breach

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • How the FBI Sought a Warrant to Search Instagram of Columbia Student Protesters
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Malaysia enacts data sharing rules for public sector
  • U.S. Enacts Take It Down Act
  • 23andMe Bankruptcy Judge Ponders Trump Bill’s Injunction Impact
  • Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant
  • US State Dept. says silence or anonymity on social media is suspicious

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.