DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Secret patient recordings – are they legal?

Posted on May 9, 2012 by Dissent

A piece from Dentistry.co.uk caught my eye this morning:

Dentists are warned that the law offers little or no protection from patients covertly recording consultations.

Patients are within their rights to record consultations and could use the information obtained to challenge their dentist’s actions.

‘Dentists would be cautioned against covertly recording patients’

The increasing use of smart phones makes it easier for patients wishing to secretly record a dental appointment and UK-wide dental defence organisation MDDUS advises dentists to keep clear, comprehensive and accurate records of consultations so they can justify their actions in court if necessary.

MDDUS dental adviser Rachael Bell said: ‘A dentist might think that a patient would require their permission to record a consultation and that any recording made covertly was illegal.’

‘However, this is not the case. When a patient seeks a consultation with a dentist, the information being processed is almost exclusively relating to the patient. Under the Data Protection Act, that data is therefore personal to the patient. By recording it, that patient is merely viewed as processing their own data.’

Read more on Dentistry.co.uk.

Is that also true in the U.S.?  In at least some cases, the answer appears to be yes.

Depending on your motivation for recording a consultation, it’s usually advisable to just ask or inform the doctor that you want to record or will be recording. Sometimes there are very good reasons to record that have nothing to do with litigation or distrust.  As one example, I always recommended that one particular patient tell all of his doctors that he would be recording his appointments with them. His memory was so severely impaired that recording the consultations enabled him to go home and review the tape as many times as he needed to so that he could follow through on their advice or so that he could remember their answers to questions he asked them.  Similarly, if you have an elderly parent who may get forgetful when feeling stressed, having a recording of the doctor’s advice to them may be very helpful in assisting them with treatment compliance.

Bottom line: if your intentions are care-related, try talking with the doctor about recording instead of doing it covertly.  And if your intentions are litigious, well, talk to a lawyer.


Related:

  • Maintenance Note
  • CISA Alert: Reported Supply Chain Compromise Affecting XZ Utils Data Compression Library, CVE-2024-3094
  • System Status Note
  • System Status Note
  • System Status Note
  • Fraudster's fake data breach claims should remind media to be careful what we report
Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Chinese Government & U.K Royal Air Force Hacked by @Drone547
TX: Former Capital One Bank employee pleads guilty in ID theft scheme →

1 thought on “Secret patient recordings – are they legal?”

  1. Anonymous says:
    May 15, 2012 at 7:43 am

    One thing is to consider states that have “two-party” recording laws, such that each party in a conversation have to agree to be recorded: http://www.rcfp.org/can-we-tape

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Washington Post hack exposes personal data of John Bolton, almost 10,000 others
  • Draft UK Cyber Security and Resilience Bill Enters UK Parliament
  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Maryland Privacy Crackdown Raises Bar for Disclosure Compliance
  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.