DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Alameda Health System’s second breach went undetected by investigators of first breach?

Posted on July 1, 2022 by Dissent

On June 24, Alameda Health System in California submitted a notification to the California Attorney General’s Office. The notification concerned a breach of an employee’s email account breach that began on April 30, 2020. The breach wasn’t discovered until February 23, 2022, and the account was locked down after that in March.

According to Alameda’s notification, the types of information involved varied by individual but included: name, date of birth, patient ID, clinical or treatment information, health insurance or claims information, Social Security number, and driver’s license number.

But it is not clear to DataBreaches whether Alameda had just forgotten to notify California or if something else happened, because in May, Alameda had already notified HHS of that incident, and had reported that 90,000 patients had been affected.

Earlier Incident

The June 2022 notification appears to be unrelated to a September 2020 notification by Alameda in which they also reported compromise of an employee’s email account. In that earlier case, Alameda reported that on June 17, 2020, they learned that, “for a brief period of time on April 8, 2020, an unauthorized person from outside AHS was able to remotely access the email account of an AHS employee.”  They then “launched an investigation and engaged a leading forensic security firm to assist in our investigation.”

So a leading forensic firm and investigation never detected that another employee email account had been compromised on April 30 or May 1 — just weeks after the known April 8 compromise — and was still compromised at all times during their investigation?

The April 8, 2020 incident reportedly impacted 2,691 patients.

NOTE: DataBreaches.net has seen some sites claiming that the 90,000 breach occurred on April 8 and was discovered June 17 of 2020. No. There were two different breach incidents reported by Alameda Health System.

AHS had two breaches that started within weeks of each other. Both involved employee email accounts.
Category: Breach IncidentsCommentaries and AnalysesHackHealth DataU.S.

Post navigation

← Updating: Breach reports from Eye Care Leaders’ clients continue to add up
Professional Finance Company, Inc. is providing breach notifications to patients of 657 covered entities →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ireland’s Data Protection Commission publishes 2024 Annual Report
  • The headlines suggested Freedman Healthcare suffered a ransomware attack that affected patient data. The reality was quite different.
  • Runsafe report: Medical device cyberattacks threaten patient care, strain budgets, top concern for healthcare sector
  • Ryuk ransomware’s initial access expert extradited to the U.S. from Ukraine
  • Alleged Geisinger hacker will defend himself pro se.
  • Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare reveals it was also impacted by Cerner/Legacy Oracle cyberattack
  • Hospital cyberattack investigation complete, no formal review needed (1)
  • Largest Ever Seizure of Funds Related to Crypto Confidence Scams
  • IMPACT: 170 patients harmed as a result of Qilin’s ransomware attack on NHS vendor Synnovis
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • US Judge Invalidates Biden Rule Protecting Privacy for Abortions
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data
  • DOJ Seeks More Time on Tower Dumps
  • Your household smart products must respect your privacy – including your air fryer
  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report