DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

ClearBalance, Bricker & Eckler settle data breach lawsuits involving patient data

Posted on September 18, 2022 by Dissent

To follow up on two previously reported breaches involving protected health information, here are two class action settlements that involve business associates:

CSI Financial Services aka ClearBalance

In July 2021, DataBreaches reported a breach at CSI Financial Services, aka ClearBalance, a firm that services loans made by hospitals and providers to patients who need to finance medical expenses.  At the time, ClearBalance notified almost 210,000 patients whose protected health information (PHI) was in employee email accounts that had been accessed without authorization.

A class action lawsuit made all the usual claims — that the firm could have prevented the breach and that it should have notified people sooner.

Without admitting any wrongdoing, CSI Financial has agreed to a $2.65 million settlement deal to resolve these allegations. California residents will get more than residents of other states, and all may get two years of credit monitoring services.

The case is Ivo Kolar v. CSI Financial Services LLC, Case No. 37-2021-00030426, in the Superior Court for the State of California, County of San Diego.  The final hearing will be in January.

For more details see, ClearBalanceClassActionSettlement.com.

h/t, Top Class Actions

Bricker and Eckler

Bricker and Eckler is a law firm in Ohio. In April 2021, they notified HHS and announced a ransomware attack had impacted 420,532 individuals. Unsurprisingly, a lawsuit was filed that claimed that the law firm could have avoided the breach by having appropriate data security.

And like most defendants in such lawsuits these days, Bricker & Eckler hasn’t admitted any wrongdoing but decided to settle because of the cost of litigation. In this case, they have settled for $1.95 million class action settlement.

The case is In Re Southern Ohio Health Systems Data Breach Litigation, Case No. A2101886, in the Court of Common Pleas for Hamilton County, Ohio.  The final hearing is in November.

For more details, see  SouthernOhioHealthSystemDataBreachSettlement.com

h/t, Top Class Actions


Related:

  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • Hackers Say They Have Personal Data of Thousands of NSA and Other Government Officials
  • UK: 'Catastrophic' attack as Russians hack files on EIGHT MoD bases and post them on the dark web
  • A business's cyber insurance policy included ransom coverage, but when they needed it, the insurer refused to pay. Why?
  • Before Their Telegram Channel Was Banned Again, ScatteredLAPSUS$Hunters Dropped Files Doxing Government Employees (2)
Category: HackHealth DataMalwareSubcontractorU.S.

Post navigation

← NYSARC Columbia County Chapter discloses ransomware incident in July
Bosnia and Herzegovina investigating alleged ransomware attack on parliament →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.