DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Category: U.S.

NYC Dermatologist Emails Spreadsheet Containing Personal Info for 15K Patients

Posted on November 24, 2015 by Dissent

Ida Siegal reports: When Missy Brown opened her email Monday morning, she was stunned to find a document from her doctor’s office containing personal information for 15,000 names. “I think the subject line said ‘coupon attached,’ and I saw that there was a spreadsheet attachment,” she said. “As soon as I opened it, I saw that…

Read more

LabMD Sues FTC Complaint Counsel Lawyers Over Data Security Case

Posted on November 24, 2015 by Dissent

C. Ryan Barber reports that one week after the initial decision by Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell in FTC v. LabMD, Michael Daugherty and LabMD filed a civil suit against three FTC attorneys involved in the case. The suit, which names Carl Settlemyer, Alain Sheer and Ruth Yodaiken as defendants, was  filed Friday in U.S. District Court for…

Read more

Quest Diagnostics sued over fax errors breach, but are they really responsible?

Posted on November 23, 2015 by Dissent

A few days ago, I noted a report from NBC about hundreds of misdirected faxes that were intended for Quest Diagnostics. The report mentioned that a lawsuit had been filed over the breach. Here’s the press release on the lawsuit, below, but I’m not sure on why it’s Quest being sued. Are they responsible or liable…

Read more

LabMD ruling should be a wake-up call for FTC data security enforcement

Posted on November 23, 2015 by Dissent

For another informed perspective on the impact of the initial decision in FTC v. LabMD, I’d strongly encourage this site’s readers to read Gus Hurwitz’s thought-provoking analysis and commentary on TechPolicyDaily.com.  Here’s a snippet: … Judge Chappell had none of the FTC’s argument. “The term ‘likely’,” he tells us, “does not mean that something is merely…

Read more

Oh, so THAT’s what happened to 160,000 Walgreens customers

Posted on November 22, 2015 by Dissent

Back in December, 2014, I noted that HHS had added an incident involving Walgreens: Walgreen Co. reported that 160,000 patients had PHI involved in an August 1st – November 6th breach involving paper records.  I was unable to find any coverage of this, but this could be big, as Walgreen has had problems before with paper records, and…

Read more

Follow-Up: Company involved in NSUH-LIJ breach folded

Posted on November 22, 2015 by Dissent

In June, this site covered a breach affecting approximately 18,000 patients of North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System. Unencrypted patient data, including SSN and clinical information, had been on five laptops stolen from Global Care Delivery, a Texas-based firm that contracted with North Shore-LIJ to process and collect payments owed by insurers to the hospital system. At the…

Read more
  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 1,071
  • 1,072
  • 1,073
  • 1,074
  • 1,075
  • 1,076
  • 1,077
  • …
  • 1,915
  • Next

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ireland’s Data Protection Commission publishes 2024 Annual Report
  • The headlines suggested Freedman Healthcare suffered a ransomware attack that affected patient data. The reality was quite different.
  • Runsafe report: Medical device cyberattacks threaten patient care, strain budgets, top concern for healthcare sector
  • Ryuk ransomware’s initial access expert extradited to the U.S. from Ukraine
  • Alleged Geisinger hacker will defend himself pro se.
  • Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare reveals it was also impacted by Cerner/Legacy Oracle cyberattack
  • Hospital cyberattack investigation complete, no formal review needed (1)
  • Largest Ever Seizure of Funds Related to Crypto Confidence Scams
  • IMPACT: 170 patients harmed as a result of Qilin’s ransomware attack on NHS vendor Synnovis
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • US Judge Invalidates Biden Rule Protecting Privacy for Abortions
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data
  • DOJ Seeks More Time on Tower Dumps
  • Your household smart products must respect your privacy – including your air fryer
  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.