DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Decreasing ransomware attacks: two strategies to consider

Posted on March 18, 2024 by Dissent

Experts agree that a ban on ransom payments should decrease ransomware attacks, but concerns about implementing any ban are not trivial. Here are two ideas to consider.

Proposal 1: Increasing the Sanctions List

Expanding the sanctions list to include every ransomware group with a leak site might make threat actors less likely to threaten victims with exposure and data leaks. It would also make victims less likely to pay. Significantly, though, it would eliminate groups’ claims about their reputation and the free publicity they get from media reports based on leak sites.

Would LockBit and BlackCat even have the reputations they have if they had not been able to promote themselves as LockBit and BlackCat? Take away their ability to advertise themselves as a brand.

If a hypothetical group, “Your Trustworthy Criminals” (YTC), cannot sign a ransom note with their group name because their group name is on the sanctions list, and if victims cannot pay them because of the sanctions list and have no reason to trust any note from strangers, what will YTC do? They might try to extort clients or patients directly, but they won’t make much that way.

Proposal 2: Add Mandatory Criminal Charges

Add criminal charges of reckless indifference or attempted homicide to anyone involved in a conspiracy related to attacking a hospital or facility that provides life-saving care. Set minimum mandatory sentences to be served consecutively, not concurrently, with any other charges. Whatever the role — selling access, encrypting, exfiltrating data, negotiating payment, money laundering — any involvement in an attack on a hospital or urgent care facility is part of a conspiracy that shows reckless indifference to life and should be prosecuted as such. Law enforcement should loudly warn young hackers that involvement of any sort will result in mandatory prison terms over and above any sentencing for hacking.

Many of the criminals are not in the U.S. and may never be extradited here, but any affiliates in North America or countries that would extradite should think about whether they might want to stand trial here for attempted murder of hundreds of people.

What Do You Think?

If you agree with either or both of my ideas, please pass them along to those who can act on them because I don’t have a seat at the table for the cool kids or influencers.

 

 

Category: BlogCommentaries and AnalysesMalware

Post navigation

← What Austin ISD said led to student information being released to non-guardians
The 2024 Breach Barometer reports a staggering 171 million patient records breached. And that’s just the ones we know about. →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Lower Merion School District says a data breach was caused by a computer glitch
  • After $1 Million Ransom Demand, Virgin Islands Lottery Restores Operations Without Paying Hackers
  • Junior Defence Contractor Arrested For Leaking Indian Naval Secrets To Suspected Pakistani Spies
  • Mysterious leaker GangExposed outs Conti kingpins in massive ransomware data dump
  • Resource: HoganLovells Asia-Pacific Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity Guide 2025
  • Class action settlement following ransomware attack will cost Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center about $52 million
  • Comstar LLC agrees to corrective action plan and fine to settle HHS OCR charges
  • Australian ransomware victims now must tell the government if they pay up
  • U.S. Sanctions Cloud Provider ‘Funnull’ as Top Source of ‘Pig Butchering’ Scams
  • Victoria’s Secret takes down website after security incident

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Fears Grow Over ICE’s Reach Into Schools
  • Resource: HoganLovells Asia-Pacific Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity Guide 2025
  • She Got an Abortion. So A Texas Cop Used 83,000 Cameras to Track Her Down.
  • Why AI May Be Listening In on Your Next Doctor’s Appointment
  • Watch out for activist judges trying to deprive us of our rights to safe reproductive healthcare
  • Nebraska Bans Minor Social Media Accounts Without Parental Consent
  • Trump Taps Palantir to Compile Data on Americans

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.