DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Sponsors seek to move on health IT bill

Posted on April 3, 2008October 24, 2024 by Dissent

Nancy Ferris writes in Government Health IT:

The leaders of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee joined representatives of the Business Roundtable in calling once again for passage of the Wired for Health Care Quality Act.

Sens. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.), the committee’s chairman, and ranking member Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.) acknowledged that the bill has been stalled by disagreements within the Senate over how to ensure the privacy of electronic health records.

“We are basically stalemated with the privacy provisions in the Judiciary Committee,” led by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Kennedy said. He added that he did not expect much, if any, opposition to the bill from the Finance Committee, which has jurisdiction over some health matters.

Leahy has introduced a strong privacy bill — the Health Information Privacy and Security Act — that Kennedy is co-sponsoring. But Kennedy’s committee has yet to act on it, and he said it is too expensive to win passage.

“Our point is, let’s get it started,” he said, referring to health information technology legislation.

“There will be data security,” Enzi said. “We don’t have to write it into law.” He added that it would be a mistake to put too many privacy and security provisions in the bill.

Ivan Seidenberg, chairman and chief executive officer of Verizon Communications, said privacy and security requirements should be established through the standards development process and enforced through third-party certification of health IT systems.

“The issue of security and privacy is easily handled” with current technologies, Seidenberg said.

[…]

Full story – Government Health IT

Comment: I disagree strongly with Senator Enzi: you do have to write security into law. And third-party certification of IT systems is not “enforcement” of either privacy or security, Mr. Seidenberg. And if security and privacy is “easily handled,” Mr. Seidenberg, can you explain why there continue to be an increasing number of breaches reported?

Congress must pass a law with genuine privacy and security protections for consumers. The Wired for Health Care Quality Act is just not yet where a bill needs to be in terms of protections. But more on that another time, when I have to really sit down and write down my comments and thoughts.

Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← UK: NHS Confidentiality, or not…
Man charged with stealing veteran's ID →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ireland’s Data Protection Commission publishes 2024 Annual Report
  • The headlines suggested Freedman Healthcare suffered a ransomware attack that affected patient data. The reality was quite different.
  • Runsafe report: Medical device cyberattacks threaten patient care, strain budgets, top concern for healthcare sector
  • Ryuk ransomware’s initial access expert extradited to the U.S. from Ukraine
  • Alleged Geisinger hacker will defend himself pro se.
  • Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare reveals it was also impacted by Cerner/Legacy Oracle cyberattack
  • Hospital cyberattack investigation complete, no formal review needed (1)
  • Largest Ever Seizure of Funds Related to Crypto Confidence Scams
  • IMPACT: 170 patients harmed as a result of Qilin’s ransomware attack on NHS vendor Synnovis
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • US Judge Invalidates Biden Rule Protecting Privacy for Abortions
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data
  • DOJ Seeks More Time on Tower Dumps
  • Your household smart products must respect your privacy – including your air fryer
  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.