DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

My Turn: Are we ready for e-medical records?

Posted on April 14, 2008October 24, 2024 by Dissent

The following opinion piece, which was written by Allen Gilbert, the Executive Director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Vermont, appeared in the Burlington Free Press today:

Allen Gilbert Vermont is about to take a huge, expensive leap into the electronic medical records field. Every Vermonter who’s ever seen a doctor or been to the hospital will be affected.

The state’s Department of Banking, Insurance, Securities, and Health Care Administration has given the green light to Fletcher Allen Health Care to spend $89 million over three years to build an e-medical records system for its hospital and 750 affiliated physicians — about half of the state’s doctors.

And the Legislature is poised to impose a surcharge on medical claims that will raise $32 million over 10 years for Vermont Information Technology Leaders. The money will be used by the public-private group to build a statewide system linking all hospitals and physicians so patient records can be sent electronically among health care providers.

Eventually, planners say, the entire nation will be linked so our health care records can be accessed anywhere, anytime — sort of a medical records ATM system.

A digitized health records system might be a very good idea. Proponents say it will improve care and save money.

It very well might improve care. Whether it will save money, however, is still being debated. Studies of existing systems show that if there are savings, they go to insurers, not doctors or patients.

What is not a good idea, though, is to plunge into this vast, expensive undertaking without a solid plan in place that has strict standards to protect the privacy of our medical records. And that hasn’t happened.

[…]

Fletcher Allen’s system, because of its scope, will drive the design of VITL’s statewide system. Let’s hope the standards set by the Wisconsin contractor hired by Fletcher Allen are sufficient to protect Vermonters’ privacy as records travel around the state, to nearby hospitals such as Dartmouth-Hitchcock and Albany Medical, and eventually to providers anywhere in the country. The Legislature’s decision to provide VITL with $32 million means that eventually every doctor’s office in the state will be connected to this vast network.

This is a big step for us to take. Are we ready for it? Our care, our privacy, and a lot of money are at stake. So far, the planning and review envisioned in state law have not been of the rigor one might hope.


Related:

  • Russian hackers target IVF clinics across UK used by thousands of couples
  • Large medical lab in South Africa suffers multiple data breaches
  • From bad to worse: Doctor Alliance hacked again by same threat actor (2)
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says
  • NHS providers reviewing stolen Synnovis data published by cyber criminals
Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Legally eHealth: Putting eHealth in its European Legal Context
Lawyers: Doctor's info leak justified / Defense says psychiatrist wanted to show teenaged suspect did not intend to kill →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Defense Bill Would Require New Cyber Requirements for Some DoD Telecom Contracts
  • Tell the truth, or someone will tell it for you — Trumbull County, Ohio edition
  • US Posts $10 Million Bounty for Iranian Hackers
  • South Korea police raid e-commerce giant Coupang over data leak; govt schedules hearing
  • FinCEN Report: Reported Ransomware Incidents and Payments Reached All-Time High in 2023
  • Leavenworth, Kansas cyberattack disrupts city services
  • They’ve escaped a lot of media attention, but Anubis RaaS is a threat to the medical sector
  • “In the most expedient time possible…”
  • Portugal updates cybercrime law to exempt security researchers
  • LockBit 5’s “new secure blog domain” infra leaked already

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • FTC Denies Petition from SpyFone App CEO to Vacate 2021 Order
  • Privacy concerns raised as Grok AI found to be a stalker’s best friend
  • PRIVACY—S.D. Cal.: Employee did not waive privacy right in personal email data on company provided laptop, (Dec 5, 2025)
  • EU justice chief draws red line on privacy reforms
  • Kaiser Permanente to Pay Up to $47.5M in Web Tracker Lawsuit

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.