DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Protected health information at risk; Ebara Technologies notifies participants of computer theft (update 1)

Posted on June 25, 2008 by Dissent

 

Ebara Technologies, Inc. Employee Medical Benefit Plan has recently notified the New Hampshire Attorney General’s Office that a break-in at one of their vendors resulted in the theft of computers that may have contained protected health information of former and current plan participants.

From the description of the incident, it appears that the unnamed vendor was Colt Express Outsourcing Services, Inc., who made notification to CNet.  In Ebara’s case, participants’ personal information included names, addresses, Social Security numbers, and/or flexible spending claims reimbursement information of plan participants and their dependents.

Somewhat puzzling, the notification letter says:

At this time, we do not know whether the protected health information of any Plan participants or dependents was actually taken.

Which raises the question, why don’t they know whether the data were on the stolen computers or not? And if the data were on the stolen computers, were they encrypted at the time of theft or not?  And were they supposed to be encrypted at rest?

Is Ebara saying that they have not been told by Colt whether their files were on the stolen hardware? Given the details in Colt’s notification to CNet, this is somewhat surprising and bears further scrutiny.

Ebara has not offered plan participants free credit monitoring.

Update 1: A spokesperson for Ebara clarified their report and confirmed that Colt Express Outsourcing Services, Inc. was the source of the breach. Ebara plan participants’ data was on the stolen computer, but according to the spokesperson, because the owner of Colt Express Outsourcing Services, Inc. informed them by phone that the computer was “password-protected,” they wrote “may have” contained PHI in their notification to the NH AG and to plan participants. That type of notification is somewhat misleading, in my opinion, as a computer being “password-protected” may offer little obstacle to accessing any unencrypted data on the equipment, and their letter created the impression that no data may have been on the computer, when it was.

Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Preying on Patients
Illinois Dept. of Human Services breach →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ex-NSA bad-guy hunter listened to Scattered Spider’s fake help-desk calls: ‘Those guys are good’
  • Former Sussex Police officer facing trial for rape charged with 18 further offences relating to computer misuse
  • Beach mansion, Benz and Bitcoin worth $4.5m seized from League of Legends hacker Shane Stephen Duffy
  • Fresno County fell victim to $1.6M phishing scam in 2020. One suspected has been arrested, another has been indicted.
  • Ransomware Attack on ADP Partner Exposes Broadcom Employee Data
  • Anne Arundel ransomware attack compromised confidential health data, county says
  • Australian national known as “DR32” sentenced in U.S. federal court
  • Alabama Man Sentenced to 14 Months in Connection with Securities and Exchange Commission X Hack that Spiked Bitcoin Prices
  • Japan enacts new Active Cyberdefense Law allowing for offensive cyber operations
  • Breachforums Boss “Pompompurin” to Pay $700k in Healthcare Breach

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Massachusetts Senate Committee Approves Robust Comprehensive Privacy Law
  • Montana Becomes First State to Close the Law Enforcement Data Broker Loophole
  • Privacy enforcement under Andrew Ferguson’s FTC
  • “We would be less confidential than Google” – Proton threatens to quit Switzerland over new surveillance law
  • CFPB Quietly Kills Rule to Shield Americans From Data Brokers
  • South Korea fines Temu for data protection violations
  • The BR Privacy & Security Download: May 2025

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.