DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Notifications reduced to green slips

Posted on February 25, 2009 by Dissent

More than one month after Heartland’s disclosure of a major breach, some customers are first finding out about it and that their card or account was affected. In some cases, however, all they are being given by way of explanation is a green slip enclosed with a replacement card. Steve Wartenberg of the Columbus Dispatch reports:

A green slip of paper accompanied each new Huntington card.

“We’ve been informed that your bank card may have been recently exposed by a third party to possible fraudulent activity,” it read in part. “Please destroy your old card and begin using your enclosed new card immediately.”

At least one customer was dissatisfied with the bank’s handling of the incident:

“They heard about it in January,” he said. “They should have alerted me immediately so I could monitor my account.”

Indeed, all over the internet, one can read comments from irate consumers, most of whom are blaming their banks or credit unions. For their part, the banks and credit unions feel like the victims of the Heartland breach because they bite the bullet on any fraudulent charges. Even though many of them have insurance to cover any losses, they may not file insurance claims out of concern that their insurance premiums will rise even more or because filing insurance claims just takes up more of their personnel’s time.

Like their customers, many of those dealing with the breach are fed up. “I have absolutely no sympathy for them (Heartland),” an executive vice-president of a credit union told me yesterday. “They knew about this last year and should have told us all immediately.” One bank, Lone Summit Bank, headquartered in Lake Lotawana, Missouri, has already filed a lawsuit against Heartland over the breach.

But consumers are getting increasingly irritated about the lack of transparency about breaches.  The fact that they may not suffer any financial harm due to zero liability is simply not enough for those who want to know more so that they can protect themselves or make informed choices about whether they want to continue using certain merchants.

In any event, little green slips do not strike me as an adequate notification or explanation. I would encourage banks and credit unions to spend the the time to develop a letter that really educates your members or customers so that they really understand where the responsibility lies for the inconvenience that they are likely to suffer.


Related:

  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • KT Chief to Resign After Cybersecurity Breach Resolution
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
  • A business's cyber insurance policy included ransom coverage, but when they needed it, the insurer refused to pay. Why?
  • Before Their Telegram Channel Was Banned Again, ScatteredLAPSUS$Hunters Dropped Files Doxing Government Employees (2)
  • Attorney General James Secures $14.2 Million from Car Insurance Companies Over Data Breaches
Category: Breach Incidents

Post navigation

← OR: Identity thief gets 36 months in prison
Sifting through the tea leaves →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Checkout.com Discloses Data Breach After Extortion Attempt
  • Washington Post hack exposes personal data of John Bolton, almost 10,000 others
  • Draft UK Cyber Security and Resilience Bill Enters UK Parliament
  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Once a Patient’s in Custody, ICE Can Be at Hospital Bedsides — But Detainees Have Rights
  • OpenAI fights order to turn over millions of ChatGPT conversations
  • Maryland Privacy Crackdown Raises Bar for Disclosure Compliance
  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.