DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

State privacy laws may undercut electronic medical records

Posted on April 14, 2009 by Dissent

John Timmer writes in Ars Technica:

The US government has now adopted a policy of fostering the adoption of electronic medical records (EMR). The policy is intended to increase the efficiency of the US healthcare system, thereby lowering costs and reducing the incidence of preventable errors. At the same time, through its The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) privacy rules, the government has set minimum standards for the security of those records. These two goals—privacy and security of these records, along with their free interchange among medical providers—can easily wind up at odds with each other. A recent study that looked at the role of state privacy laws in EMR adoption suggests that the problem is very real, as state privacy laws seem to inhibit the use of EMR by hospitals located there.

The study he is discussing is:
Miller, Amalia R. and Tucker, Catherine: Privacy Protection and Technology Diffusion: The Case of Electronic Medical Records (February 5, 2008). NET Institute Working Paper No. 07-16. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=960233 and is available in free full-text form for download.

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← HK: Lost flash drive with patient data wasn’t password-protected
UK: Second data blunder fear →

4 thoughts on “State privacy laws may undercut electronic medical records”

  1. Anonymous says:
    April 14, 2009 at 11:51 am

    Interesting! Can federal law override the state law in this case? or is it patient who utimately decide what he want ?

  2. Anonymous says:
    April 14, 2009 at 12:12 pm

    I think states have the right to impose more protections for their residents than the floor protections set by the federal government. The question you pose is really, “Can the federal government strip states of their right to impose higher standards in service of a national agenda or policy?”

    I’d like to say that they can’t, but we’ve already seen the 110th Congress strip the citizenry of what some of us believe were our rights with respect to warrantless wiretapping.

    Any constitutional lawyers around who can answer Andy’s excellent question?

  3. Anonymous says:
    July 10, 2009 at 10:53 am

    Hi dissent there has been many problem almost everywhere, where EMR is used in abundance. The system got hacked, are there any companies which are giving protection software to run the system.

  4. Anonymous says:
    July 10, 2009 at 12:09 pm

    I don’t think that adequate security is simply a matter of having the right software. There’s much more to it than that. Are there companies that advertise software that might help? Sure, but no software app is up to the challenge of employees who don’t adhere to policy or who take data home with them, etc. etc.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Western intelligence agencies unite to expose Russian hacking campaign against logistics and tech firms
  • Disrupting Lumma Stealer: Microsoft leads global action against favored cybercrime tool
  • Researchers Scrape 2 Billion Discord Messages and Publish Them Online
  • Privilege Under Fire: Protecting Forensic Reports in the Wake of a Data Breach
  • Hacker who breached communications app used by Trump aide stole data from across US government
  • Massachusetts hacker to plead guilty to PowerSchool data breach (1)
  • Cyberattack brings down Kettering Health phone lines, MyChart patient portal access (1)
  • Gujarat ATS arrests 18-year-old for cyberattacks during Operation Sindoor
  • Hackers Nab 15 Years of UK Legal Aid Applicant Data
  • Supplier to major UK supermarkets Aldi, Tesco & Sainsbury’s hit by cyber attack with ransom demand

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Researchers Scrape 2 Billion Discord Messages and Publish Them Online
  • GDPR is cracking: Brussels rewrites its prized privacy law
  • Telegram Gave Authorities Data on More than 20,000 Users
  • Police secretly monitored New Orleans with facial recognition cameras
  • Cocospy stalkerware apps go offline after data breach
  • Drugmaker Regeneron to acquire 23andMe out of bankruptcy
  • Massachusetts Senate Committee Approves Robust Comprehensive Privacy Law

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report