DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

CVS, Walgreens settle with Indiana AG

Posted on July 10, 2009 by Dissent

Settlements have been reached between the Indiana Attorney General’s office and two pharmacy chains – CVS and Walgreens –  to resolve data-breach complaints that customers’ medical information was improperly discarded in trash bins outside pharmacy stores. The agreement comes as the Attorney General begins a new concerted effort geared to address the growing problem of identity theft.

Under the agreements, negotiated by the Attorney General’s office and representatives of the Indiana Board of Pharmacy, both CVS/pharmacy and Walgreen Co. agree to implement extensive employee training, management policies and detailed reporting to provide greater safeguards so that customers’ personal information will not be improperly disclosed.

Filed today, both proposed agreements are scheduled for consideration by the Board of Pharmacy on Monday, July 13, and would take effect upon the board’s order.

“By locking in new records-handling procedures, the agreements create a new level of protection for customers of these pharmacies that their private medical information will remain just that – private and confidential,” Indiana Attorney Greg Zoeller said.

The cases involved 10 CVS pharmacies and six Walgreens pharmacies in Indiana. In 2006, an Indianapolis television station aired news segments about customers’ prescription records being discovered in outdoor trash bins where they could have been found and used to commit identity theft, although no actual consumer is known to have been victimized.

After investigating, the Office of the Indiana Attorney General filed administrative complaints in 2007 with the Board of Pharmacy against the licenses of individual pharmacies and pharmacists involved in the data disclosures at the stores.

Disclosing confidential medical information violates state and federal laws, including the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act or HIPAA. The federal Office for Civil Rights also investigated the privacy breaches; and eventually it reached its own settlement with CVS where that company agreed to pay the federal government $2.25 million in civil penalties. The OCR’s federal case involving Walgreen Co. is ongoing.

“Our goal has been to provide a consistent resolution on the CVS and Walgreens cases so that they will follow new requirements that will establish strong standards. The bottom line: consumers of both chains will be protected,” Zoeller added.

Under the agreements, both CVS and Walgreens will submit annual reports with the Board that detail changes to their policies, their employee training programs and other steps to comply with state and federal privacy laws. All pharmacy employees at the stores will be trained on the new rules. And if any medical-privacy breach happens in the future, CVS or Walgreens would be required to notify the Board of Pharmacy and Attorney General’s Office.

Under the agreement, CVS will make a $1,000 donation to a charity of its choice, in addition to the $2.25 million it paid under the federal agreement. Walgreens will pay $6,000 to reimburse all costs to the state for its investigation.

“These payments are not intended to be punitive; they represent the companies’ commitments to ensuring consumers’ privacy,” Zoeller said. “This comes at a time we are making a concerted effort to address the growing problem of identity theft in Indiana. Under enhancements to state and federal laws, we now will have additional legal tools to protect Hoosiers.”

Both companies issued statements about the proposed settlement agreements:

“CVS/pharmacy is committed to being an industry leader in privacy matters and places a high priority on protecting the privacy of its customers. This matter relates to the alleged inadvertent disposal of patient information at a small number of Indiana CVS/pharmacy locations in 2006 in a manner that was inconsistent with our policies and procedures,” said Christine Egan, Vice President of Privacy Practices at CVS Caremark. “Our settlement obligations with the State of Indiana reinforce our existing business practices in regard to protecting patient information, employee training on privacy issues, and monitoring the effectiveness of privacy policies and procedures on a regular basis.”

The statement from Walgreen Co.:

“We are glad to reach this agreement and believe we have always followed HIPAA standards. We have sound practices and policies that protect our patients’ information, and we will continue to adhere to them.”

The Board of Pharmacy had a representative at each set of negotiations with the Attorney General’s office and the pharmacy companies.

Source: Office of the Indiana Attorney General


Related:

  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • Massachusetts hospitals Heywood, Athol say outage was a cybersecurity incident
  • Heritage Provider Network $49.99M Class Action Settlement
  • Integris Health Agrees to $30 Million Settlement Over 2023 Data Breach
  • They were victims of a massive data breach in 2009. Interior Health denied it for a decade.
Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← UK: Harpenden surgery accused of breaching patient confidentiality
California dreaming →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Des Moines Man Charged with Computer Fraud
  • CrowdStrike catches insider feeding information to ScatteredLapsus$Hunters
  • Two suspected Scattered Spider hackers plead not guilty over Transport for London cyberattack
  • Attleboro investigating ‘cybersecurity incident’ impacting city’s IT systems
  • Fired techie admits sabotaging ex-employer, causing $862K in damage
  • Threat actors have reportedly launched yet another campaign involving an application connected to Salesforce
  • Russian hackers target IVF clinics across UK used by thousands of couples
  • US, allies sanction Russian bulletproof hosting services for ransomware support
  • Researchers claim ‘largest leak ever’ after uncovering WhatsApp enumeration flaw
  • Large medical lab in South Africa suffers multiple data breaches

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Cole v. Quest Diagnostics: The Third Circuit Weighs in on Pixels, Privacy, and Medical Data
  • Closing the Privacy Gap: HIPRA Targets Health Apps and Wearables
  • Researchers claim ‘largest leak ever’ after uncovering WhatsApp enumeration flaw
  • CIPL Publishes Discussion Paper Comparing U.S. State Privacy Law Definitions of Personal Data and Sensitive Data
  • India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 brought into force

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.