DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Driver's Ed Photos of Dead Youth Didn't Violate Family's Privacy

Posted on December 17, 2009 by Dissent

Jeff Gorman reports:

A woman can’t collect damages from a paramedic who displayed photos of her son’s dead body in a driver’s education class, the Tennessee Court of Appeals ruled.

Jeremy Wooten died in a car accident at the age of 21. Paramedic Don Horton kept the photos, which are typically taken at the scene of serious accidents, in an album.

Horton spoke at a driver’s education class three months later at the high school Jeremy had attended. One student recognized Jeremy and became upset. She took the photos of Jeremy out of the album and ran out of class.

The student gave the photos to Jeremy’s best friend. He passed them along to Jeremy’s family, who sued Horton and Robertson County for invasion of privacy, infliction of emotional distress and mishandling of human remains.

The trial court dismissed the emotional distress charge, because the family members were not in the driver’s education class. The court ruled for the defendants on all other charges.

On appeal, Judge Holly Kirby ruled that the photograph display did not constitute a mishandling of human remains or an invasion of privacy.

“As the trial court observed, the photos were taken in a public place. We must respectfully conclude that, under these circumstances, a display of these photos cannot be deemed an ‘intrusion’ into the plaintiffs’ ‘seclusion’ or into their private affairs,” Kirby wrote.

You can read the court opinion here.

Frankly, I was surprised when I read the story, so I read the ruling to see how the judge reasoned. While reading the ruling helps, I still find myself offended by the outcome.

And even if it isn’t a violation of state law, isn’t this a HIPAA violation as the paramedic was in his professional capacity when he took the picture? Can some HIPAA expert explain this to me?

No related posts.

Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Hacker hits NC community college system
Heartland pays Amex $3.6M over 2008 data breach →

2 thoughts on “Driver's Ed Photos of Dead Youth Didn't Violate Family's Privacy”

  1. Anonymous says:
    December 20, 2009 at 1:08 am

    This is pretty straightforward, this lawsuit clearly had no merit whatsoever.

    Generally when you are outdoors in a public area (such as in a street) you have absolutely no expectation of privacy whatsoever. You can be filmed or photographed without permission. HIPAA doesnt even come into play, a random bystander could have also legally photographed the scene.

  2. Anonymous says:
    December 20, 2009 at 9:47 am

    If a medic renders services to an accident victim while in their capacity as part of a HIPAA-covered entity, then even if the accident was in a public space, the medic cannot discuss the services rendered as that would be a HIPAA violation, right? How is taking a photo and then displaying it not exposing information obtained while in the capacity of a HIPAA-covered entity? What the public can do is one thing, but HIPAA-covered entities are held to a different/higher standard, I thought.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Hunters International to provide free decryptors for all victims as they shut down (1)
  • SEC and SolarWinds Seek Settlement in Securities Fraud Case
  • Cyberattacks Disrupt Iran’s Bread Distribution, Payments Remain Frozen
  • Hacker with ‘political agenda’ stole data from Columbia, university says
  • Keymous+ Hacker Group Claims Responsibility for Over 700 Global DDoS Attacks
  • Data breach reveals Catwatchful ‘stalkerware’ is spying on thousands of phones
  • DOJ investigates ex-ransomware negotiator over extortion kickbacks
  • Hackers Using PDFs to Impersonate Microsoft, DocuSign, and More in Callback Phishing Campaigns
  • One in Five Law Firms Hit by Cyberattacks Over Past 12 Months
  • U.S. Sanctions Russian Bulletproof Hosting Provider for Supporting Cybercriminals Behind Ransomware

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Record-Breaking $1.55M CCPA Settlement Against Health Information Website Publisher
  • Ninth Circuit Reviews Website Tracking Class Actions and the Reach of California’s Privacy Law
  • US healthcare offshoring: Navigating patient data privacy laws and regulations
  • Data breach reveals Catwatchful ‘stalkerware’ is spying on thousands of phones
  • Google Trackers: What You Can Actually Escape And What You Can’t
  • Oregon Amends Its Comprehensive Privacy Statute
  • Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Liberal Majority Strikes Down 176-Year-Old Abortion Ban

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.