DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Addition to Washington Breach Law Imposes Retailer Liability in Payment Card Breaches

Posted on March 25, 2010 by Dissent

Under a Washington law effective July 1, 2010, certain entities involved in payment card transactions may be liable to financial institutions for costs associated with reissuing payment cards after security breaches.  Designed to encourage the reissuance of payment cards as a means of mitigating harm caused by security breaches, Washington H.B. 1149 applies to three types of entities:  businesses, processors and vendors.  Under the law, a business is an entity that “processes more than six million credit card and debit card transactions annually, and who provides, offers, or sells goods or services to . . . residents of Washington.” A processor is any entity, other than a business, that “directly processes or transmits [payment card] account information for or on behalf of another person as part of a payment processing service.” A vendor is any “entity that manufactures and sells software or equipment that is designed to process, transmit, or store [payment card] account information or that maintains account information that it does not own.”

Read more on Hunton & Williams LLP


Related:

  • CrowdStrike catches insider feeding information to ScatteredLapsus$Hunters
  • Threat actors have reportedly launched yet another campaign involving an application connected to Salesforce
  • Sue The Hackers – Google Sues Over Phishing as a Service
  • Five major changes to the regulation of cybersecurity in the UK under the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill
  • From bad to worse: Doctor Alliance hacked again by same threat actor (2)
  • Draft UK Cyber Security and Resilience Bill Enters UK Parliament
Category: LegislationOf NoteState/Local

Post navigation

← YPG employee data possibly compromised
DHEC employee fired after SLED inquiry →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Defense Bill Would Require New Cyber Requirements for Some DoD Telecom Contracts
  • Tell the truth, or someone will tell it for you — Trumbull County, Ohio edition
  • US Posts $10 Million Bounty for Iranian Hackers
  • South Korea police raid e-commerce giant Coupang over data leak; govt schedules hearing
  • FinCEN Report: Reported Ransomware Incidents and Payments Reached All-Time High in 2023
  • Leavenworth, Kansas cyberattack disrupts city services
  • They’ve escaped a lot of media attention, but Anubis RaaS is a threat to the medical sector
  • “In the most expedient time possible…”
  • Portugal updates cybercrime law to exempt security researchers
  • LockBit 5’s “new secure blog domain” infra leaked already

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • FTC Denies Petition from SpyFone App CEO to Vacate 2021 Order
  • Privacy concerns raised as Grok AI found to be a stalker’s best friend
  • PRIVACY—S.D. Cal.: Employee did not waive privacy right in personal email data on company provided laptop, (Dec 5, 2025)
  • EU justice chief draws red line on privacy reforms
  • Kaiser Permanente to Pay Up to $47.5M in Web Tracker Lawsuit

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.