DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Maryland Attorney General Settles with Mid Atlantic Processing

Posted on May 11, 2010 by Dissent

Attorney General Douglas F. Gansler announced that his Consumer Protection Division has entered into a settlement with MAP, LLC, a payment processing company formerly doing business as Mid Atlantic Processing, and Martin A. Taylor and Rony Natanzon, two officers of the company. The Division alleged that when Mid Atlantic Processing closed its Owings Mills office in May 2009, instead of properly disposing of business records containing private and sensitive consumer information, the business discarded those records in a dumpster. Seventy-seven boxes of business records that the Division alleged included consumers’ Social Security numbers, cancelled checks and other sensitive personal information were recovered by the police and provided to the Division. Under the Maryland Personal Information Protection Act, it is an unfair and deceptive trade practice for a business to destroy records containing customers’ personal information without taking reasonable steps to protect against unauthorized access to or use of the personal information.

“Mid Atlantic Processing did not take the required steps to safeguard the privacy of their customers’ personal information, making them vulnerable to identity theft,” said Attorney General Gansler. “When a business disposes of its client records that contain personal consumer information, it needs to shred the records or take other steps necessary to ensure that a consumer’s privacy is not compromised.”

Based on its investigation, the Division does not believe that any consumer’s personal information was compromised and the company and its officers denied any liability. However, the settlement requires the company and its officers to take reasonable steps to dispose of the 77 boxes of records in the Division’s possession, and to take similar steps in the future when disposing of records containing personal or sensitive consumer information. Such steps may include hiring a shredding company. The company and its officers also agreed to pay a $20,000 penalty.

Source: Attorney General Douglas F. Gansler


Related:

  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
  • Resource: NY DFS Issues New Cybersecurity Guidance to Address Risks Associated with the Use of Third-Party Service Providers
  • TX: Kaufman County Faces Cybersecurity Attack: Courthouse Computer Operations Disrupted
  • KT Chief to Resign After Cybersecurity Breach Resolution
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
Category: Breach IncidentsExposureFinancial SectorOtherU.S.

Post navigation

← NM Medicaid members told about security breach (updated)
Judge won't accept pleas in Jackson Memorial Hospital ID theft case →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.