DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Fla. Court Wrongfully Compelled Medical Treatment of Pregnant Woman, Appeals Court Rules

Posted on August 17, 2010 by Dissent

In a follow-up to a disturbing case previously covered here and here, finally some respect for privacy from the courts:

The state of Florida cannot compel a pregnant woman to comply with medical treatment to protect the fetus unless the state shows a compelling interest that overrules the woman’s constitutional right to make her own decisions about medical care, a state appellate court ruled Aug. 12, BNA reports.

The split-panel decision by the Florida’s 1st District Court of Appeals involved a case in which a trial court ordered a pregnant mother of two to submit to hospital confinement, medical treatment and a surgical delivery. The woman, who was experiencing complications during her pregnancy, was reported to the attorney general’s office by a health provider after she refused medical treatment. The attorney general’s office initiated a legal procedure to compel the woman to submit to medical treatment.

The trial court ruled that the woman’s refusal of medical treatment placed her pregnancy at high-risk and created a “substantial and unacceptable” risk to her fetus. The trial court said the state’s interests in protecting the fetus superseded the woman’s privacy interests, and she was ordered to comply with her doctor’s orders. The woman submitted to hospitalization, medical treatment and a caesarean delivery, although the fetus was delivered stillborn.

Read more in Women’s Health Policy Report.

Via Medical News Today.

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Data Security Breach Bill Calls for Strict Notification
UK: Council staff pry into DWP database →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • IMPACT: 170 patients harmed as a result of Qilin’s ransomware attack on NHS vendor Synnovis
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • UBS reports data leak after cyber attack on provider, client data unaffected
  • Scania confirms insurance claim data breach in extortion attempt
  • Cybersecurity takes a big hit in new Trump executive order
  • Episource notifying 5.4 million patients of cyberattack in January
  • Investigation of 2024 Helsinki data breach – Report
  • Major trial underway for data leak that left 72,000 victims in France
  • Anubis: A Closer Look at an Emerging Ransomware with Built-in Wiper
  • HealthEC Agrees to $5.48 Million Settlement to End Data Breach Lawsuit

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data
  • DOJ Seeks More Time on Tower Dumps
  • Your household smart products must respect your privacy – including your air fryer
  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.