DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

When is three years of free credit monitoring still not enough?

Posted on September 29, 2010 by Dissent

How quickly times change.

It seems like only a few years ago that we thought it newsworthy that a breached entity would offer a year of free credit monitoring.

Then it became newsworthy when they offered two years.

Then it became newsworthy when they didn’t offer any free services.

Now some retirees in Delaware are claiming that even three years of free credit monitoring services is not enough and they want lifetime coverage.

In the aftermath of a breach in which the  Social Security Numbers, dates of birth and gender of 22,000 Delaware retirees were exposed on the state’s procurement site for four days in August, Aon Consulting originally offered one year of free services. It eventually upped its offer to three years. But even that is seemingly not enough for at least some of those affected, as J.L. Miller reports.

As I’ve previously commented, I do not agree, based on available information, that Aon Consulting should be shouldering all of the blame or costs  for this breach. But apart from that issue, what is the appropriate length of free services to offer in these situations? Does four days of having your data at risk warrant lifetime free services? I would have thought not, but it got me thinking about whether there might be circumstances under which some might think lifetime services are warranted. What do you think?

One positive thing that has come out of the Delaware breach, however, is that more people are now questioning the state’s use of their SSN:

When retired educator Wayne Emsley asked how many third parties have been given his Social Security number, and why the state couldn’t use an employee ID number instead, Visalli said her priority is getting the retirees signed up for credit monitoring, and that the state is reviewing its internal practices.

“I don’t feel that you’ve answered either of my questions,” Emsley said.

Hopefully, the state will answer those questions and other states will also ask themselves the same questions.

Category: Breach IncidentsCommentaries and AnalysesExposureGovernment SectorOf NoteSubcontractor

Post navigation

← Social Networks For Patients Stir Privacy, Security Worries
Did the punishment fit the "crime?" (the Lucile Salter Packard Hospital breach fines) →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • WestJet investigates cyberattack disrupting internal systems
  • Plastic surgeons often store nude photos of patients with their identity information. When would we call that “negligent?”
  • India: Servers of two city hospitals hacked; police register FIR
  • Ph: Coop Hospital confirms probe into reported cyberattack
  • Slapped wrists for Financial Conduct Authority staff who emailed work data home
  • School Districts Unaware BoardDocs Software Published Their Private Files
  • A guilty plea in the PowerSchool case still leaves unanswered questions
  • Brussels Parliament hit by cyber-attack
  • Sweden under cyberattack: Prime minister sounds the alarm
  • Former CIA Analyst Sentenced to Over Three Years in Prison for Unlawfully Transmitting Top Secret National Defense Information

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe
  • AI tools collect and store data about you from all your devices – here’s how to be aware of what you’re revealing
  • 23andMe Privacy Ombudsman Urges User Consent Pre-Data Sale

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.