DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Ca: Victim of privacy breach wants hospital to explain

Posted on November 3, 2010 by Dissent

Hugh Adami reports:

One would think The Ottawa Hospital would readily explain to Allyson Merrison how an X-ray technician — her husband’s ex-wife — was punished for electronically breaching her medical records six times over 10 months. But, says the hospital, privacy laws for its employees prevent it from revealing how it dealt with Teri Lynn Allan.

Merrison says Allan started accessing the records in July 2008, the month Merrison had a miscarriage. Before the miscarriage and for several months after, Merrison says Allan was trying to find out whether her former husband, Kevin Mulholland, was planning to have a family with his new partner.

[…]

Concerned the hospital didn’t take the case seriously and that Allan was hardly disciplined, Merrison turned last month to Ontario’s Information and Privacy Commissioner as well as the College of Medical Radiation Technologists of Ontario. Both have agreed to investigate. Merrison also filed a complaint with the hospital’s board of directors, but says she has not received a reply.

[…]

The nurse accessed the patient’s electronic health records 10 times over a six-week period, during and after her stay in hospital. The patient had alerted the hospital that it had to be vigilant in protecting her medical records. She was involved in bitter divorce proceedings and a custody battle for the couple’s children.

The hospital suspended the nurse without pay for four weeks, and the estranged husband for 10 days. The privacy commissioner ordered the hospital to review practices, procedures and protocol in dealing with patient health information. It was also ordered to ensure that steps were taken to stop continued unauthorized use of a patient’s file once a breach is detected. A spokesman with the Information and Privacy Commissioner says the nurse continued to access the woman’s records even after she was caught.

Read more on Ottawa Citizen.

This is a fairly common scenario as far as employee snooping cases go and I can understand why a patient whose privacy has been breached this way would want to know that strong measures were taken and that the offender was adequately punished. I also understand the hospital’s position that it cannot discuss personnel matters.

So what do you think? Do you think that such snooping, if as alleged in the news story, should lead to terminating an employee’s job? Do employees who engage in such conduct deserve any second chances or should healthcare settings have a true zero tolerance policy?

Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Ca: Health records privacy breach affects more than 100 in Sarnia, Ont., area
CO: Personhood Amendent slammed by voters →

1 thought on “Ca: Victim of privacy breach wants hospital to explain”

  1. Anonymous says:
    November 3, 2010 at 9:35 pm

    I say a true zero tolerance is the way to go when it comes to patient information privacy. However, each incident has to be dealt case by case. Mistakes are bound to happen as long as humans involved but background of the person involved in such incident should determine the action the administrator must take. I say second chance has to be given but not for all. Because there are some irresponsible and negligent professionals as well.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Lower Merion School District says a data breach was caused by a computer glitch
  • After $1 Million Ransom Demand, Virgin Islands Lottery Restores Operations Without Paying Hackers
  • Junior Defence Contractor Arrested For Leaking Indian Naval Secrets To Suspected Pakistani Spies
  • Mysterious leaker GangExposed outs Conti kingpins in massive ransomware data dump
  • Resource: HoganLovells Asia-Pacific Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity Guide 2025
  • Class action settlement following ransomware attack will cost Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center about $52 million
  • Comstar LLC agrees to corrective action plan and fine to settle HHS OCR charges
  • Australian ransomware victims now must tell the government if they pay up
  • U.S. Sanctions Cloud Provider ‘Funnull’ as Top Source of ‘Pig Butchering’ Scams
  • Victoria’s Secret takes down website after security incident

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Fears Grow Over ICE’s Reach Into Schools
  • Resource: HoganLovells Asia-Pacific Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity Guide 2025
  • She Got an Abortion. So A Texas Cop Used 83,000 Cameras to Track Her Down.
  • Why AI May Be Listening In on Your Next Doctor’s Appointment
  • Watch out for activist judges trying to deprive us of our rights to safe reproductive healthcare
  • Nebraska Bans Minor Social Media Accounts Without Parental Consent
  • Trump Taps Palantir to Compile Data on Americans

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.