DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Ca: Victim of privacy breach wants hospital to explain

Posted on November 3, 2010 by Dissent

Hugh Adami reports:

One would think The Ottawa Hospital would readily explain to Allyson Merrison how an X-ray technician — her husband’s ex-wife — was punished for electronically breaching her medical records six times over 10 months. But, says the hospital, privacy laws for its employees prevent it from revealing how it dealt with Teri Lynn Allan.

Merrison says Allan started accessing the records in July 2008, the month Merrison had a miscarriage. Before the miscarriage and for several months after, Merrison says Allan was trying to find out whether her former husband, Kevin Mulholland, was planning to have a family with his new partner.

[…]

Concerned the hospital didn’t take the case seriously and that Allan was hardly disciplined, Merrison turned last month to Ontario’s Information and Privacy Commissioner as well as the College of Medical Radiation Technologists of Ontario. Both have agreed to investigate. Merrison also filed a complaint with the hospital’s board of directors, but says she has not received a reply.

[…]

The nurse accessed the patient’s electronic health records 10 times over a six-week period, during and after her stay in hospital. The patient had alerted the hospital that it had to be vigilant in protecting her medical records. She was involved in bitter divorce proceedings and a custody battle for the couple’s children.

The hospital suspended the nurse without pay for four weeks, and the estranged husband for 10 days. The privacy commissioner ordered the hospital to review practices, procedures and protocol in dealing with patient health information. It was also ordered to ensure that steps were taken to stop continued unauthorized use of a patient’s file once a breach is detected. A spokesman with the Information and Privacy Commissioner says the nurse continued to access the woman’s records even after she was caught.

Read more on Ottawa Citizen.

This is a fairly common scenario as far as employee snooping cases go and I can understand why a patient whose privacy has been breached this way would want to know that strong measures were taken and that the offender was adequately punished. I also understand the hospital’s position that it cannot discuss personnel matters.

So what do you think? Do you think that such snooping, if as alleged in the news story, should lead to terminating an employee’s job? Do employees who engage in such conduct deserve any second chances or should healthcare settings have a true zero tolerance policy?

Related posts:

  • Small-Scale Violations of Medical Privacy Often Cause the Most Harm
  • (follow-up) Privacy czar orders Ottawa Hospital to tighten rules on personal information
Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Ca: Health records privacy breach affects more than 100 in Sarnia, Ont., area
CO: Personhood Amendent slammed by voters →

1 thought on “Ca: Victim of privacy breach wants hospital to explain”

  1. Anonymous says:
    November 3, 2010 at 9:35 pm

    I say a true zero tolerance is the way to go when it comes to patient information privacy. However, each incident has to be dealt case by case. Mistakes are bound to happen as long as humans involved but background of the person involved in such incident should determine the action the administrator must take. I say second chance has to be given but not for all. Because there are some irresponsible and negligent professionals as well.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • National Health Care Fraud Takedown Results in 324 Defendants Charged in Connection with Over $14.6 Billion in Alleged Fraud
  • Swiss Health Foundation Radix Hit by Cyberattack Affecting Federal Data
  • Russian hackers get 7 and 5 years in prison for large-scale cyber attacks with ransomware, over 60 million euros in bitcoins seized
  • Bolton Walk-In Clinic patient data leak locked down (finally!)
  • 50 Customers of French Bank Hit by Insider SIM Swap Scam
  • Ontario health agency atHome ordered to inform 200,000 patients of March data breach
  • Fact-Checking Claims By Cybernews: The 16 Billion Record Data Breach That Wasn’t
  • Horizon Healthcare RCM discloses ransomware attack in December
  • Disgruntled IT Worker Jailed for Cyber Attack, Huddersfield
  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The Trump administration is building a national citizenship data system
  • Supreme Court Decision on Age Verification Tramples Free Speech and Undermines Privacy
  • New Jersey Issues Draft Privacy Regulations: The New
  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report
  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.