DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Ankle + Foot Center of Tampa Bay breach affecting 156,000 included Social Security Numbers as well as PHI

Posted on February 3, 2011 by Dissent

Now that I have additional information on a hacking incident involving the protected health information (PHI) of 156,000 patients of the Ankle + Foot Center of Tampa Bay, it is clear that this breach belongs on this site. I had previously noted it on PHIprivacy.net on January 29 after it appeared on HHS’s breach tool. At the time, however, I found no statement on the center’s web site or additional details.

A copy of the center’s notification letter to patients dated January 7th subsequently became available on their web site. It reads, in part:

On or about November 10, 2010, the Company learned that outside third party attempts had been made against the Practice Management System that stores your personal patient data, including your health information.

The information accessed by this unauthorized third party included information such as patient names, social security numbers, date of birth, home addressees, account numbers, and healthcare services and related diagnostic code(s) (“Personal Information”).  The Company is conducting an internal investigation of the circumstances surrounding the unauthorized third party’s actions and appropriate authorities have been notified.

And in a “personal statement” also posted to their site, they write:

I understand your concern, Ankle and Foot center has no evidence that any of their patients lives have been adversely affected, nor do we have any evidence to date that their data has been compromised. This is strictly a preventative measure on the part of  Ankle and Foot Centers to notify all of their patients that there may have been a breach and to closely monitor their own personal records for any unauthorized changes. Ankle and Foot Centers has elected to voluntarily notify the proper authorities at the Health and Human Services and is working closely with the FBI to ensure that our patients data still is, and always will remain confidential. If you have any further questions please call our 877 number or visit our website. This is an ongoing investigation and this is what we know

The personal statement seems to be more confusing or self-serving than anything. Having told patients that their information was accessed, they are then also told that “there may have been a breach” and there is no evidence to date that their data “has been compromised.”   What will most members of the public do with such information in light of that statement?  Is it overly reassuring and would they have been better off being told, “Look, you could be at risk of identity theft or fraudulent use of your data, so we strongly recommend that you….”

I really wish Congress would enact legislation that specifies important required elements of a breach disclosure/notice and that prohibits certain kinds of misleading statements.

Carousel Image © Judydean | Dreamstime.com

No related posts.

Category: Breach IncidentsHackHealth DataOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← UK: Patients are "misled" over confidentiality of health e-records, say Oxford researchers
NV: Conspirator in case involving University Medical Center patient data pleads guilty →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Hunters International to provide free decryptors for all victims as they shut down (1)
  • SEC and SolarWinds Seek Settlement in Securities Fraud Case
  • Cyberattacks Disrupt Iran’s Bread Distribution, Payments Remain Frozen
  • Hacker with ‘political agenda’ stole data from Columbia, university says
  • Keymous+ Hacker Group Claims Responsibility for Over 700 Global DDoS Attacks
  • Data breach reveals Catwatchful ‘stalkerware’ is spying on thousands of phones
  • DOJ investigates ex-ransomware negotiator over extortion kickbacks
  • Hackers Using PDFs to Impersonate Microsoft, DocuSign, and More in Callback Phishing Campaigns
  • One in Five Law Firms Hit by Cyberattacks Over Past 12 Months
  • U.S. Sanctions Russian Bulletproof Hosting Provider for Supporting Cybercriminals Behind Ransomware

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Record-Breaking $1.55M CCPA Settlement Against Health Information Website Publisher
  • Ninth Circuit Reviews Website Tracking Class Actions and the Reach of California’s Privacy Law
  • US healthcare offshoring: Navigating patient data privacy laws and regulations
  • Data breach reveals Catwatchful ‘stalkerware’ is spying on thousands of phones
  • Google Trackers: What You Can Actually Escape And What You Can’t
  • Oregon Amends Its Comprehensive Privacy Statute
  • Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Liberal Majority Strikes Down 176-Year-Old Abortion Ban

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.