DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

UK: Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence admits it doesn't know what happened to files containing sensitive personal data

Posted on April 11, 2011 by Dissent

In the second of two undertakings  announced by the Information Commissioner’s Office on April 11, the Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence (CHRE) was found to be in breach of the Data Protection Act after the possible loss of documents from complaint review files containing sensitive personal data. The ICO notes, however, that “due to weaknesses in CHRE’s document recording, administration and communication processes the organisation cannot be certain if the information was ever received or whether it was subsequently lost or destroyed.”

Harry Cayton, Chief Executive of CHRE stated:

The Information Commissioner (the ‘Commissioner’) was provided with two reports from CHRE in November and December 2010 regarding the possible loss of a number of hard copy documents containing the sensitive personal data of several individuals involved in three separate complaint review cases.

In November 2010, when CHRE came to review the cases, certain documents on each file could not be accounted for. Some of these documents included information about individuals’ health and criminal convictions. It is not known for certain whether the paperwork in question was ever received into CHRE’s offices, or if it has since been lost or destroyed. These incidents highlighted significant weaknesses in CHRE’s document recording, administration and communication processes.

That’s bad, and reminds me of what we saw the other day in a report the other day by Phoenix Ireland, where the life assurance firm admitted that it did not know whether the backup tape had even been created, and if it had, whether it had ever been shipped to another office. Such failures in record-keeping are not only embarrassing but should result in stern penalties.

CORRECTION: I had indicated that there was no accompanying press release.  One was issued.


Related:

  • Veradigm's Breach Claims Under Scrutiny After Dark Web Leak
  • UK: Woman charged after NHS patients' records accessed in data breach
  • Landmark civil penalty of AU$5.8 million issued under Australia’s Privacy Act
  • Safaricom-Backed M-TIBA Victim of a Possible Data Breach Affecting Millions of Kenyans
  • Another plastic surgery practice fell prey to a cyberattack that acquired patient photos and info
  • Two U.K. teenagers appear in court over Transport of London cyber attack
Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← UK: Medical histories of children and birth mothers lost in move – NHS Liverpool Community Health
Texas comptroller’s office data breach exposes 3.5 million teachers’ and employees’ Social Security numbers and other personal information →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.