DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

NY's highest court rules HIPAA trumps Kendra's law

Posted on May 11, 2011 by Dissent

Alison Frankel of Reuters reports:

U.S. privacy laws bar release of a mental health patient’s records as part of an effort to compel outpatient treatment unless the disclosure is authorized by the patient or a court, the New York Court of Appeals ruled on Tuesday.

It was the first time a state’s highest court had ruled on the scope of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability (HIPAA) Act’s privacy provisions in an involuntary mental health treatment proceeding, said the patient’s lawyers, Scott M. Wells and Dennis Feld of the New York Mental Hygiene Legal Services.

The ruling was In the Matter of Miguel M. The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene sought in 2007 to compel Miguel M. to receive mental health treatment under Kendra’s Law, a 1999 New York statute that permits public officials to demand outpatient treatment orders for mental health patients who have been hospitalized after failing to comply with treatment plans.

At the Supreme Court hearing on Miguel M.’s treatment order, counsel for the city asked to introduce into evidence records of the patient’s two recent hospitalizations for schizoaffective disorder. Although the city conceded that the records had been obtained without the patient’s consent or a court order, it argued that the disclosure was permissible under Kendra’s Law.

Miguel M.’s counsel opposed the introduction of his hospital records, citing HIPAA’s privacy strictures. After briefing on the question, the trial court admitted the records, finding that HIPAA permits the disclosure under a provision authorizing public health officials to collect information in order to prevent disease or injury or to conduct a public health investigation or intervention. An intermediate appellate court upheld the ruling.

But in Tuesday’s decision, the Court of Appeals found that neither of those exceptions to HIPAA’s presumption of privacy apply in this case.

Read more on Reuters.

I’m really pleased to see this decision.

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Man who solicited patient records from University Medical Center of Southern Nevada employee sentenced to prison
(follow-up) Romanian national sentenced in PNC skimming case →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Plastic surgeons often store nude photos of patients with their identity information. When would we call that “negligent?”
  • India: Servers of two city hospitals hacked; police register FIR
  • Ph: Coop Hospital confirms probe into reported cyberattack
  • Slapped wrists for Financial Conduct Authority staff who emailed work data home
  • School Districts Unaware BoardDocs Software Published Their Private Files
  • A guilty plea in the PowerSchool case still leaves unanswered questions
  • Brussels Parliament hit by cyber-attack
  • Sweden under cyberattack: Prime minister sounds the alarm
  • Former CIA Analyst Sentenced to Over Three Years in Prison for Unlawfully Transmitting Top Secret National Defense Information
  • FIN6 cybercriminals pose as job seekers on LinkedIn to hack recruiters

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe
  • AI tools collect and store data about you from all your devices – here’s how to be aware of what you’re revealing
  • 23andMe Privacy Ombudsman Urges User Consent Pre-Data Sale

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.