DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Three newly reported breaches all involved…. paper records

Posted on July 3, 2011 by Dissent

Interesting:  the three new breaches on HHS’s breach tool that I hadn’t heard about already all involved paper records.  Here are the entries from their tool showing the name(s) of involved entities, the number of patients affected or notified, the date of the breach, and the type of breach:

Medicare Fee-for-Service Program, MD, “Cahaba Government Benefit Administrators LLC“,” 13,412″, 4/11/2011, Unauthorized Access/Disclosure , Paper,,

Cahaba is a private contractor for Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services that administers Medicare fee-for-service programs. I see no notice linked from their web site home page at this time.

Tuba City Regional Health Care Corporation, AZ,, “2,000” , 4/1/2011, Loss/Improper Disposal,Paper,,

Once on the TCR section of their web site, I did find a notice that reads, in part:

Recently we discovered that dietician treatment cards were missing during a department move from the main hospital to the new Outpatient Primary Care Center. Treatment cards included personal health information and phone numbers used by the dietician to counsel patients. Upon learning of this, we launched an internal investigation to try to determine what happened to the cards. We believe that the cards were inadvertently destroyed in the facility’s trash compacter.

A description of the types of unsecured protected health information involved in the breach:
Dietician treatment cards included but not limited to: patient name, date of birth, phone number, medical record number, treatment plan, progress notes, medications, diagnoses, procedures, height, weight, visit dates, and diagnostic findings.

And finally:

Navos, WA,,”2,700″, 3/15/2011, Unknown, Paper,,

Navos Mental Health Solutions in Washington provides both outpatient and inpatient services.  There does not seem to be any notice on their web site at this time that I can find.

So… over 17,000 records with PHI in three incidents that many people would not even try to track because gosh darn it, big hacks of electronic databases are “sexier” than breaches involving paper records.

For years, I’ve been advocating to pay more attention to paper breaches.  At the risk of sounding like a broken record: both Congress and states need to look at existing and proposed laws to see if they mandate adequate security of paper records and breach notification for breaches involving paper records.  Only a minority of states seemingly require breach notice of this kind.  While HIPAA requires notification for covered entities, what about businesses that are not HIPAA-covered entities?  Shouldn’t they also be required to secure and notify?

Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Part 3 of Australian Election data leaked
Report: M’sia group hacked S’pore NParks site →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Japan enacts new Active Cyberdefense Law allowing for offensive cyber operations
  • Breachforums Boss “Pompompurin” to Pay $700k in Healthcare Breach
  • HHS Office for Civil Rights Settles HIPAA Cybersecurity Investigation with Vision Upright MRI
  • Additional 12 Defendants Charged in RICO Conspiracy for over $263 Million Cryptocurrency Thefts, Money Laundering, Home Break-Ins
  • RIBridges firewall worked. But forensic report says hundreds of alarms went unnoticed by Deloitte.
  • Chinese Hackers Hit Drone Sector in Supply Chain Attacks
  • Coinbase says hackers bribed staff to steal customer data and are demanding $20 million ransom
  • $28 million in Texas’ cybersecurity funding for schools left unspent
  • Cybersecurity incident at Central Point School District 6
  • Official Indiana .gov email addresses are phishing residents

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Privacy enforcement under Andrew Ferguson’s FTC
  • “We would be less confidential than Google” – Proton threatens to quit Switzerland over new surveillance law
  • CFPB Quietly Kills Rule to Shield Americans From Data Brokers
  • South Korea fines Temu for data protection violations
  • The BR Privacy & Security Download: May 2025
  • License Plate Reader Company Flock Is Building a Massive People Lookup Tool, Leak Shows
  • FTC dismisses privacy concerns in Google breakup

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.