DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Commentary: Belmont bank must pay fine for data breach, but was a fine too harsh?

Posted on July 29, 2011 by Dissent

Greg Turner reports:

Belmont Savings Bank agreed to pay $7,500 in a settlement of a consumer data breach case with the state attorney general’s office.

In May, the bank lost an unencrypted computer tape containing the personal information of more than 13,000 customers.

A bank employee left the backup tape on a desk instead of storing it in a vault for the night, and it was inadvertently tossed into the trash by a cleaning crew, according to Attorney General Martha Coakley’s office. The tape “was most likely incinerated” by the bank’s waste-disposal company.

Read more on BostonHerald.com

As much as I am for enforcement, I must confess that I do not approve of this  fine. What is the point in fining an entity for a human error mistake – one of those momentary brain fade mistakes that we all make many times in our lives and work? Wouldn’t it just make more sense to say, “Thanks for reporting and notifying your customers, and what’s your plan so you avoid this type of screwup up again?”

If Massachusetts or states start fining for breaches like this one, we may wind up with more entities trying to hide breaches. And that would not be a good outcome.

Let’s save the fines for more egregious breaches or where entities have repeat breaches because they do not seem to have learned from their mistakes.


Related:

  • UN Cybercrime Convention to be signed in Hanoi to tackle global offences
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
  • Resource: NY DFS Issues New Cybersecurity Guidance to Address Risks Associated with the Use of Third-Party Service Providers
  • TX: Kaufman County Faces Cybersecurity Attack: Courthouse Computer Operations Disrupted
  • Bombay High Court Orders Department of Telecommunications to Block Medusa Accounts After Generali Insurance Data Breach
Category: Breach IncidentsFinancial SectorLost or MissingOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← BET24.com breach highlights needs for greater disclosure in a timely fashion
Data stolen from 35 million South Korean social networking users →

2 thoughts on “Commentary: Belmont bank must pay fine for data breach, but was a fine too harsh?”

  1. Adam says:
    July 29, 2011 at 11:39 am

    Why do they have unencrypted tapes? Mistakes are always the end of a chain.

    1. admin says:
      July 30, 2011 at 7:46 am

      Here’s Attorney General Coakley’s statement on the matter. It seems like they were fined for not following their protocol on handling the tape, but it doesn’t say whether the fine was because they failed to encrypt it to begin with or that was a violation of their protocol. When things slow down here, I’ll try to follow up to find out more about why, with all of the mistakes made every day, this one resulted in a fine.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.