DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Commentary: Belmont bank must pay fine for data breach, but was a fine too harsh?

Posted on July 29, 2011 by Dissent

Greg Turner reports:

Belmont Savings Bank agreed to pay $7,500 in a settlement of a consumer data breach case with the state attorney general’s office.

In May, the bank lost an unencrypted computer tape containing the personal information of more than 13,000 customers.

A bank employee left the backup tape on a desk instead of storing it in a vault for the night, and it was inadvertently tossed into the trash by a cleaning crew, according to Attorney General Martha Coakley’s office. The tape “was most likely incinerated” by the bank’s waste-disposal company.

Read more on BostonHerald.com

As much as I am for enforcement, I must confess that I do not approve of this  fine. What is the point in fining an entity for a human error mistake – one of those momentary brain fade mistakes that we all make many times in our lives and work? Wouldn’t it just make more sense to say, “Thanks for reporting and notifying your customers, and what’s your plan so you avoid this type of screwup up again?”

If Massachusetts or states start fining for breaches like this one, we may wind up with more entities trying to hide breaches. And that would not be a good outcome.

Let’s save the fines for more egregious breaches or where entities have repeat breaches because they do not seem to have learned from their mistakes.


Related:

  • Former U.S. Soldier Pleads Guilty to Hacking and Extortion Scheme Involving Telecommunications Companies
  • DOGE Denizen Marko Elez Leaked API Key for xAI
  • Four people bailed after arrests over cyber attacks on M&S, Co-op and Harrods
  • Texas Enacts Electronic Health Record Data Localization Law
  • United Australia Party confirms ransomware attack, personal data and email correspondence exposed
Category: Breach IncidentsFinancial SectorLost or MissingOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← BET24.com breach highlights needs for greater disclosure in a timely fashion
Data stolen from 35 million South Korean social networking users →

2 thoughts on “Commentary: Belmont bank must pay fine for data breach, but was a fine too harsh?”

  1. Adam says:
    July 29, 2011 at 11:39 am

    Why do they have unencrypted tapes? Mistakes are always the end of a chain.

    1. admin says:
      July 30, 2011 at 7:46 am

      Here’s Attorney General Coakley’s statement on the matter. It seems like they were fined for not following their protocol on handling the tape, but it doesn’t say whether the fine was because they failed to encrypt it to begin with or that was a violation of their protocol. When things slow down here, I’ll try to follow up to find out more about why, with all of the mistakes made every day, this one resulted in a fine.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • North Country Healthcare responds to Stormous’s claims of a breach
  • Gladney Adoption Center had serious data exposures in the past few months. What will they do to prevent more?
  • Former U.S. Soldier Pleads Guilty to Hacking and Extortion Scheme Involving Telecommunications Companies
  • DOGE Denizen Marko Elez Leaked API Key for xAI
  • Four people bailed after arrests over cyber attacks on M&S, Co-op and Harrods
  • RansomedVC is back — and is still attacking its competitors
  • Texas Enacts Electronic Health Record Data Localization Law
  • United Australia Party confirms ransomware attack, personal data and email correspondence exposed
  • Armenian National Extradited to the United States Faces Federal Charges for Ransomware Extortion Conspiracy
  • 70% of healthcare cyberattacks result in delayed patient care, report finds

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Texas Enacts Electronic Health Record Data Localization Law
  • Upstate NY county clerk again refuses to enforce Texas abortion judgment
  • Attorney General James Leads Coalition Urging Congress to Protect Americans from Masked ICE Agents
  • Attorney General Tong Announces $85,000 Settlement with TicketNetwork for Violations of the Connecticut Data Privacy Act​
  • Fourth Circuit upholds West Virginia ban on abortion pills
  • Meta fixes bug that could leak users’ AI prompts and generated content
  • The EU’s Plan To Ban Private Messaging Could Have a Global Impact (Plus: What To Do About It)

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.